| 1 | // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only | 
|---|
| 2 | /* | 
|---|
| 3 | * RT-Mutexes: simple blocking mutual exclusion locks with PI support | 
|---|
| 4 | * | 
|---|
| 5 | * started by Ingo Molnar and Thomas Gleixner. | 
|---|
| 6 | * | 
|---|
| 7 | *  Copyright (C) 2004-2006 Red Hat, Inc., Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> | 
|---|
| 8 | *  Copyright (C) 2005-2006 Timesys Corp., Thomas Gleixner <tglx@timesys.com> | 
|---|
| 9 | *  Copyright (C) 2005 Kihon Technologies Inc., Steven Rostedt | 
|---|
| 10 | *  Copyright (C) 2006 Esben Nielsen | 
|---|
| 11 | * Adaptive Spinlocks: | 
|---|
| 12 | *  Copyright (C) 2008 Novell, Inc., Gregory Haskins, Sven Dietrich, | 
|---|
| 13 | *				     and Peter Morreale, | 
|---|
| 14 | * Adaptive Spinlocks simplification: | 
|---|
| 15 | *  Copyright (C) 2008 Red Hat, Inc., Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com> | 
|---|
| 16 | * | 
|---|
| 17 | *  See Documentation/locking/rt-mutex-design.rst for details. | 
|---|
| 18 | */ | 
|---|
| 19 | #include <linux/sched.h> | 
|---|
| 20 | #include <linux/sched/debug.h> | 
|---|
| 21 | #include <linux/sched/deadline.h> | 
|---|
| 22 | #include <linux/sched/signal.h> | 
|---|
| 23 | #include <linux/sched/rt.h> | 
|---|
| 24 | #include <linux/sched/wake_q.h> | 
|---|
| 25 | #include <linux/ww_mutex.h> | 
|---|
| 26 |  | 
|---|
| 27 | #include <trace/events/lock.h> | 
|---|
| 28 |  | 
|---|
| 29 | #include "rtmutex_common.h" | 
|---|
| 30 | #include "lock_events.h" | 
|---|
| 31 |  | 
|---|
| 32 | #ifndef WW_RT | 
|---|
| 33 | # define build_ww_mutex()	(false) | 
|---|
| 34 | # define ww_container_of(rtm)	NULL | 
|---|
| 35 |  | 
|---|
| 36 | static inline int __ww_mutex_add_waiter(struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, | 
|---|
| 37 | struct rt_mutex *lock, | 
|---|
| 38 | struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx, | 
|---|
| 39 | struct wake_q_head *wake_q) | 
|---|
| 40 | { | 
|---|
| 41 | return 0; | 
|---|
| 42 | } | 
|---|
| 43 |  | 
|---|
| 44 | static inline void __ww_mutex_check_waiters(struct rt_mutex *lock, | 
|---|
| 45 | struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx, | 
|---|
| 46 | struct wake_q_head *wake_q) | 
|---|
| 47 | { | 
|---|
| 48 | } | 
|---|
| 49 |  | 
|---|
| 50 | static inline void ww_mutex_lock_acquired(struct ww_mutex *lock, | 
|---|
| 51 | struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx) | 
|---|
| 52 | { | 
|---|
| 53 | } | 
|---|
| 54 |  | 
|---|
| 55 | static inline int __ww_mutex_check_kill(struct rt_mutex *lock, | 
|---|
| 56 | struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, | 
|---|
| 57 | struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx) | 
|---|
| 58 | { | 
|---|
| 59 | return 0; | 
|---|
| 60 | } | 
|---|
| 61 |  | 
|---|
| 62 | #else | 
|---|
| 63 | # define build_ww_mutex()	(true) | 
|---|
| 64 | # define ww_container_of(rtm)	container_of(rtm, struct ww_mutex, base) | 
|---|
| 65 | # include "ww_mutex.h" | 
|---|
| 66 | #endif | 
|---|
| 67 |  | 
|---|
| 68 | /* | 
|---|
| 69 | * lock->owner state tracking: | 
|---|
| 70 | * | 
|---|
| 71 | * lock->owner holds the task_struct pointer of the owner. Bit 0 | 
|---|
| 72 | * is used to keep track of the "lock has waiters" state. | 
|---|
| 73 | * | 
|---|
| 74 | * owner	bit0 | 
|---|
| 75 | * NULL		0	lock is free (fast acquire possible) | 
|---|
| 76 | * NULL		1	lock is free and has waiters and the top waiter | 
|---|
| 77 | *				is going to take the lock* | 
|---|
| 78 | * taskpointer	0	lock is held (fast release possible) | 
|---|
| 79 | * taskpointer	1	lock is held and has waiters** | 
|---|
| 80 | * | 
|---|
| 81 | * The fast atomic compare exchange based acquire and release is only | 
|---|
| 82 | * possible when bit 0 of lock->owner is 0. | 
|---|
| 83 | * | 
|---|
| 84 | * (*) It also can be a transitional state when grabbing the lock | 
|---|
| 85 | * with ->wait_lock is held. To prevent any fast path cmpxchg to the lock, | 
|---|
| 86 | * we need to set the bit0 before looking at the lock, and the owner may be | 
|---|
| 87 | * NULL in this small time, hence this can be a transitional state. | 
|---|
| 88 | * | 
|---|
| 89 | * (**) There is a small time when bit 0 is set but there are no | 
|---|
| 90 | * waiters. This can happen when grabbing the lock in the slow path. | 
|---|
| 91 | * To prevent a cmpxchg of the owner releasing the lock, we need to | 
|---|
| 92 | * set this bit before looking at the lock. | 
|---|
| 93 | */ | 
|---|
| 94 |  | 
|---|
| 95 | static __always_inline struct task_struct * | 
|---|
| 96 | rt_mutex_owner_encode(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, struct task_struct *owner) | 
|---|
| 97 | { | 
|---|
| 98 | unsigned long val = (unsigned long)owner; | 
|---|
| 99 |  | 
|---|
| 100 | if (rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock)) | 
|---|
| 101 | val |= RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS; | 
|---|
| 102 |  | 
|---|
| 103 | return (struct task_struct *)val; | 
|---|
| 104 | } | 
|---|
| 105 |  | 
|---|
| 106 | static __always_inline void | 
|---|
| 107 | rt_mutex_set_owner(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, struct task_struct *owner) | 
|---|
| 108 | { | 
|---|
| 109 | /* | 
|---|
| 110 | * lock->wait_lock is held but explicit acquire semantics are needed | 
|---|
| 111 | * for a new lock owner so WRITE_ONCE is insufficient. | 
|---|
| 112 | */ | 
|---|
| 113 | xchg_acquire(&lock->owner, rt_mutex_owner_encode(lock, owner)); | 
|---|
| 114 | } | 
|---|
| 115 |  | 
|---|
| 116 | static __always_inline void rt_mutex_clear_owner(struct rt_mutex_base *lock) | 
|---|
| 117 | { | 
|---|
| 118 | /* lock->wait_lock is held so the unlock provides release semantics. */ | 
|---|
| 119 | WRITE_ONCE(lock->owner, rt_mutex_owner_encode(lock, NULL)); | 
|---|
| 120 | } | 
|---|
| 121 |  | 
|---|
| 122 | static __always_inline void clear_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex_base *lock) | 
|---|
| 123 | { | 
|---|
| 124 | lock->owner = (struct task_struct *) | 
|---|
| 125 | ((unsigned long)lock->owner & ~RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS); | 
|---|
| 126 | } | 
|---|
| 127 |  | 
|---|
| 128 | static __always_inline void | 
|---|
| 129 | fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, bool acquire_lock) | 
|---|
| 130 | { | 
|---|
| 131 | unsigned long owner, *p = (unsigned long *) &lock->owner; | 
|---|
| 132 |  | 
|---|
| 133 | if (rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock)) | 
|---|
| 134 | return; | 
|---|
| 135 |  | 
|---|
| 136 | /* | 
|---|
| 137 | * The rbtree has no waiters enqueued, now make sure that the | 
|---|
| 138 | * lock->owner still has the waiters bit set, otherwise the | 
|---|
| 139 | * following can happen: | 
|---|
| 140 | * | 
|---|
| 141 | * CPU 0	CPU 1		CPU2 | 
|---|
| 142 | * l->owner=T1 | 
|---|
| 143 | *		rt_mutex_lock(l) | 
|---|
| 144 | *		lock(l->lock) | 
|---|
| 145 | *		l->owner = T1 | HAS_WAITERS; | 
|---|
| 146 | *		enqueue(T2) | 
|---|
| 147 | *		boost() | 
|---|
| 148 | *		  unlock(l->lock) | 
|---|
| 149 | *		block() | 
|---|
| 150 | * | 
|---|
| 151 | *				rt_mutex_lock(l) | 
|---|
| 152 | *				lock(l->lock) | 
|---|
| 153 | *				l->owner = T1 | HAS_WAITERS; | 
|---|
| 154 | *				enqueue(T3) | 
|---|
| 155 | *				boost() | 
|---|
| 156 | *				  unlock(l->lock) | 
|---|
| 157 | *				block() | 
|---|
| 158 | *		signal(->T2)	signal(->T3) | 
|---|
| 159 | *		lock(l->lock) | 
|---|
| 160 | *		dequeue(T2) | 
|---|
| 161 | *		deboost() | 
|---|
| 162 | *		  unlock(l->lock) | 
|---|
| 163 | *				lock(l->lock) | 
|---|
| 164 | *				dequeue(T3) | 
|---|
| 165 | *				 ==> wait list is empty | 
|---|
| 166 | *				deboost() | 
|---|
| 167 | *				 unlock(l->lock) | 
|---|
| 168 | *		lock(l->lock) | 
|---|
| 169 | *		fixup_rt_mutex_waiters() | 
|---|
| 170 | *		  if (wait_list_empty(l) { | 
|---|
| 171 | *		    l->owner = owner | 
|---|
| 172 | *		    owner = l->owner & ~HAS_WAITERS; | 
|---|
| 173 | *		      ==> l->owner = T1 | 
|---|
| 174 | *		  } | 
|---|
| 175 | *				lock(l->lock) | 
|---|
| 176 | * rt_mutex_unlock(l)		fixup_rt_mutex_waiters() | 
|---|
| 177 | *				  if (wait_list_empty(l) { | 
|---|
| 178 | *				    owner = l->owner & ~HAS_WAITERS; | 
|---|
| 179 | * cmpxchg(l->owner, T1, NULL) | 
|---|
| 180 | *  ===> Success (l->owner = NULL) | 
|---|
| 181 | * | 
|---|
| 182 | *				    l->owner = owner | 
|---|
| 183 | *				      ==> l->owner = T1 | 
|---|
| 184 | *				  } | 
|---|
| 185 | * | 
|---|
| 186 | * With the check for the waiter bit in place T3 on CPU2 will not | 
|---|
| 187 | * overwrite. All tasks fiddling with the waiters bit are | 
|---|
| 188 | * serialized by l->lock, so nothing else can modify the waiters | 
|---|
| 189 | * bit. If the bit is set then nothing can change l->owner either | 
|---|
| 190 | * so the simple RMW is safe. The cmpxchg() will simply fail if it | 
|---|
| 191 | * happens in the middle of the RMW because the waiters bit is | 
|---|
| 192 | * still set. | 
|---|
| 193 | */ | 
|---|
| 194 | owner = READ_ONCE(*p); | 
|---|
| 195 | if (owner & RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS) { | 
|---|
| 196 | /* | 
|---|
| 197 | * See rt_mutex_set_owner() and rt_mutex_clear_owner() on | 
|---|
| 198 | * why xchg_acquire() is used for updating owner for | 
|---|
| 199 | * locking and WRITE_ONCE() for unlocking. | 
|---|
| 200 | * | 
|---|
| 201 | * WRITE_ONCE() would work for the acquire case too, but | 
|---|
| 202 | * in case that the lock acquisition failed it might | 
|---|
| 203 | * force other lockers into the slow path unnecessarily. | 
|---|
| 204 | */ | 
|---|
| 205 | if (acquire_lock) | 
|---|
| 206 | xchg_acquire(p, owner & ~RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS); | 
|---|
| 207 | else | 
|---|
| 208 | WRITE_ONCE(*p, owner & ~RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS); | 
|---|
| 209 | } | 
|---|
| 210 | } | 
|---|
| 211 |  | 
|---|
| 212 | /* | 
|---|
| 213 | * We can speed up the acquire/release, if there's no debugging state to be | 
|---|
| 214 | * set up. | 
|---|
| 215 | */ | 
|---|
| 216 | #ifndef CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES | 
|---|
| 217 | static __always_inline bool rt_mutex_cmpxchg_acquire(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, | 
|---|
| 218 | struct task_struct *old, | 
|---|
| 219 | struct task_struct *new) | 
|---|
| 220 | { | 
|---|
| 221 | return try_cmpxchg_acquire(&lock->owner, &old, new); | 
|---|
| 222 | } | 
|---|
| 223 |  | 
|---|
| 224 | static __always_inline bool rt_mutex_try_acquire(struct rt_mutex_base *lock) | 
|---|
| 225 | { | 
|---|
| 226 | return rt_mutex_cmpxchg_acquire(lock, NULL, current); | 
|---|
| 227 | } | 
|---|
| 228 |  | 
|---|
| 229 | static __always_inline bool rt_mutex_cmpxchg_release(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, | 
|---|
| 230 | struct task_struct *old, | 
|---|
| 231 | struct task_struct *new) | 
|---|
| 232 | { | 
|---|
| 233 | return try_cmpxchg_release(&lock->owner, &old, new); | 
|---|
| 234 | } | 
|---|
| 235 |  | 
|---|
| 236 | /* | 
|---|
| 237 | * Callers must hold the ->wait_lock -- which is the whole purpose as we force | 
|---|
| 238 | * all future threads that attempt to [Rmw] the lock to the slowpath. As such | 
|---|
| 239 | * relaxed semantics suffice. | 
|---|
| 240 | */ | 
|---|
| 241 | static __always_inline void mark_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex_base *lock) | 
|---|
| 242 | { | 
|---|
| 243 | unsigned long *p = (unsigned long *) &lock->owner; | 
|---|
| 244 | unsigned long owner, new; | 
|---|
| 245 |  | 
|---|
| 246 | owner = READ_ONCE(*p); | 
|---|
| 247 | do { | 
|---|
| 248 | new = owner | RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS; | 
|---|
| 249 | } while (!try_cmpxchg_relaxed(p, &owner, new)); | 
|---|
| 250 |  | 
|---|
| 251 | /* | 
|---|
| 252 | * The cmpxchg loop above is relaxed to avoid back-to-back ACQUIRE | 
|---|
| 253 | * operations in the event of contention. Ensure the successful | 
|---|
| 254 | * cmpxchg is visible. | 
|---|
| 255 | */ | 
|---|
| 256 | smp_mb__after_atomic(); | 
|---|
| 257 | } | 
|---|
| 258 |  | 
|---|
| 259 | /* | 
|---|
| 260 | * Safe fastpath aware unlock: | 
|---|
| 261 | * 1) Clear the waiters bit | 
|---|
| 262 | * 2) Drop lock->wait_lock | 
|---|
| 263 | * 3) Try to unlock the lock with cmpxchg | 
|---|
| 264 | */ | 
|---|
| 265 | static __always_inline bool unlock_rt_mutex_safe(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, | 
|---|
| 266 | unsigned long flags) | 
|---|
| 267 | __releases(lock->wait_lock) | 
|---|
| 268 | { | 
|---|
| 269 | struct task_struct *owner = rt_mutex_owner(lock); | 
|---|
| 270 |  | 
|---|
| 271 | clear_rt_mutex_waiters(lock); | 
|---|
| 272 | raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lock->wait_lock, flags); | 
|---|
| 273 | /* | 
|---|
| 274 | * If a new waiter comes in between the unlock and the cmpxchg | 
|---|
| 275 | * we have two situations: | 
|---|
| 276 | * | 
|---|
| 277 | * unlock(wait_lock); | 
|---|
| 278 | *					lock(wait_lock); | 
|---|
| 279 | * cmpxchg(p, owner, 0) == owner | 
|---|
| 280 | *					mark_rt_mutex_waiters(lock); | 
|---|
| 281 | *					acquire(lock); | 
|---|
| 282 | * or: | 
|---|
| 283 | * | 
|---|
| 284 | * unlock(wait_lock); | 
|---|
| 285 | *					lock(wait_lock); | 
|---|
| 286 | *					mark_rt_mutex_waiters(lock); | 
|---|
| 287 | * | 
|---|
| 288 | * cmpxchg(p, owner, 0) != owner | 
|---|
| 289 | *					enqueue_waiter(); | 
|---|
| 290 | *					unlock(wait_lock); | 
|---|
| 291 | * lock(wait_lock); | 
|---|
| 292 | * wake waiter(); | 
|---|
| 293 | * unlock(wait_lock); | 
|---|
| 294 | *					lock(wait_lock); | 
|---|
| 295 | *					acquire(lock); | 
|---|
| 296 | */ | 
|---|
| 297 | return rt_mutex_cmpxchg_release(lock, old: owner, NULL); | 
|---|
| 298 | } | 
|---|
| 299 |  | 
|---|
| 300 | #else | 
|---|
| 301 | static __always_inline bool rt_mutex_cmpxchg_acquire(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, | 
|---|
| 302 | struct task_struct *old, | 
|---|
| 303 | struct task_struct *new) | 
|---|
| 304 | { | 
|---|
| 305 | return false; | 
|---|
| 306 |  | 
|---|
| 307 | } | 
|---|
| 308 |  | 
|---|
| 309 | static int __sched rt_mutex_slowtrylock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock); | 
|---|
| 310 |  | 
|---|
| 311 | static __always_inline bool rt_mutex_try_acquire(struct rt_mutex_base *lock) | 
|---|
| 312 | { | 
|---|
| 313 | /* | 
|---|
| 314 | * With debug enabled rt_mutex_cmpxchg trylock() will always fail. | 
|---|
| 315 | * | 
|---|
| 316 | * Avoid unconditionally taking the slow path by using | 
|---|
| 317 | * rt_mutex_slow_trylock() which is covered by the debug code and can | 
|---|
| 318 | * acquire a non-contended rtmutex. | 
|---|
| 319 | */ | 
|---|
| 320 | return rt_mutex_slowtrylock(lock); | 
|---|
| 321 | } | 
|---|
| 322 |  | 
|---|
| 323 | static __always_inline bool rt_mutex_cmpxchg_release(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, | 
|---|
| 324 | struct task_struct *old, | 
|---|
| 325 | struct task_struct *new) | 
|---|
| 326 | { | 
|---|
| 327 | return false; | 
|---|
| 328 | } | 
|---|
| 329 |  | 
|---|
| 330 | static __always_inline void mark_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex_base *lock) | 
|---|
| 331 | { | 
|---|
| 332 | lock->owner = (struct task_struct *) | 
|---|
| 333 | ((unsigned long)lock->owner | RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS); | 
|---|
| 334 | } | 
|---|
| 335 |  | 
|---|
| 336 | /* | 
|---|
| 337 | * Simple slow path only version: lock->owner is protected by lock->wait_lock. | 
|---|
| 338 | */ | 
|---|
| 339 | static __always_inline bool unlock_rt_mutex_safe(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, | 
|---|
| 340 | unsigned long flags) | 
|---|
| 341 | __releases(lock->wait_lock) | 
|---|
| 342 | { | 
|---|
| 343 | lock->owner = NULL; | 
|---|
| 344 | raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lock->wait_lock, flags); | 
|---|
| 345 | return true; | 
|---|
| 346 | } | 
|---|
| 347 | #endif | 
|---|
| 348 |  | 
|---|
| 349 | static __always_inline int __waiter_prio(struct task_struct *task) | 
|---|
| 350 | { | 
|---|
| 351 | int prio = task->prio; | 
|---|
| 352 |  | 
|---|
| 353 | if (!rt_or_dl_prio(prio)) | 
|---|
| 354 | return DEFAULT_PRIO; | 
|---|
| 355 |  | 
|---|
| 356 | return prio; | 
|---|
| 357 | } | 
|---|
| 358 |  | 
|---|
| 359 | /* | 
|---|
| 360 | * Update the waiter->tree copy of the sort keys. | 
|---|
| 361 | */ | 
|---|
| 362 | static __always_inline void | 
|---|
| 363 | waiter_update_prio(struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, struct task_struct *task) | 
|---|
| 364 | { | 
|---|
| 365 | lockdep_assert_held(&waiter->lock->wait_lock); | 
|---|
| 366 | lockdep_assert(RB_EMPTY_NODE(&waiter->tree.entry)); | 
|---|
| 367 |  | 
|---|
| 368 | waiter->tree.prio = __waiter_prio(task); | 
|---|
| 369 | waiter->tree.deadline = task->dl.deadline; | 
|---|
| 370 | } | 
|---|
| 371 |  | 
|---|
| 372 | /* | 
|---|
| 373 | * Update the waiter->pi_tree copy of the sort keys (from the tree copy). | 
|---|
| 374 | */ | 
|---|
| 375 | static __always_inline void | 
|---|
| 376 | waiter_clone_prio(struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, struct task_struct *task) | 
|---|
| 377 | { | 
|---|
| 378 | lockdep_assert_held(&waiter->lock->wait_lock); | 
|---|
| 379 | lockdep_assert_held(&task->pi_lock); | 
|---|
| 380 | lockdep_assert(RB_EMPTY_NODE(&waiter->pi_tree.entry)); | 
|---|
| 381 |  | 
|---|
| 382 | waiter->pi_tree.prio = waiter->tree.prio; | 
|---|
| 383 | waiter->pi_tree.deadline = waiter->tree.deadline; | 
|---|
| 384 | } | 
|---|
| 385 |  | 
|---|
| 386 | /* | 
|---|
| 387 | * Only use with rt_waiter_node_{less,equal}() | 
|---|
| 388 | */ | 
|---|
| 389 | #define task_to_waiter_node(p)	\ | 
|---|
| 390 | &(struct rt_waiter_node){ .prio = __waiter_prio(p), .deadline = (p)->dl.deadline } | 
|---|
| 391 | #define task_to_waiter(p)	\ | 
|---|
| 392 | &(struct rt_mutex_waiter){ .tree = *task_to_waiter_node(p) } | 
|---|
| 393 |  | 
|---|
| 394 | static __always_inline int rt_waiter_node_less(struct rt_waiter_node *left, | 
|---|
| 395 | struct rt_waiter_node *right) | 
|---|
| 396 | { | 
|---|
| 397 | if (left->prio < right->prio) | 
|---|
| 398 | return 1; | 
|---|
| 399 |  | 
|---|
| 400 | /* | 
|---|
| 401 | * If both waiters have dl_prio(), we check the deadlines of the | 
|---|
| 402 | * associated tasks. | 
|---|
| 403 | * If left waiter has a dl_prio(), and we didn't return 1 above, | 
|---|
| 404 | * then right waiter has a dl_prio() too. | 
|---|
| 405 | */ | 
|---|
| 406 | if (dl_prio(prio: left->prio)) | 
|---|
| 407 | return dl_time_before(a: left->deadline, b: right->deadline); | 
|---|
| 408 |  | 
|---|
| 409 | return 0; | 
|---|
| 410 | } | 
|---|
| 411 |  | 
|---|
| 412 | static __always_inline int rt_waiter_node_equal(struct rt_waiter_node *left, | 
|---|
| 413 | struct rt_waiter_node *right) | 
|---|
| 414 | { | 
|---|
| 415 | if (left->prio != right->prio) | 
|---|
| 416 | return 0; | 
|---|
| 417 |  | 
|---|
| 418 | /* | 
|---|
| 419 | * If both waiters have dl_prio(), we check the deadlines of the | 
|---|
| 420 | * associated tasks. | 
|---|
| 421 | * If left waiter has a dl_prio(), and we didn't return 0 above, | 
|---|
| 422 | * then right waiter has a dl_prio() too. | 
|---|
| 423 | */ | 
|---|
| 424 | if (dl_prio(prio: left->prio)) | 
|---|
| 425 | return left->deadline == right->deadline; | 
|---|
| 426 |  | 
|---|
| 427 | return 1; | 
|---|
| 428 | } | 
|---|
| 429 |  | 
|---|
| 430 | static inline bool rt_mutex_steal(struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, | 
|---|
| 431 | struct rt_mutex_waiter *top_waiter) | 
|---|
| 432 | { | 
|---|
| 433 | if (rt_waiter_node_less(left: &waiter->tree, right: &top_waiter->tree)) | 
|---|
| 434 | return true; | 
|---|
| 435 |  | 
|---|
| 436 | #ifdef RT_MUTEX_BUILD_SPINLOCKS | 
|---|
| 437 | /* | 
|---|
| 438 | * Note that RT tasks are excluded from same priority (lateral) | 
|---|
| 439 | * steals to prevent the introduction of an unbounded latency. | 
|---|
| 440 | */ | 
|---|
| 441 | if (rt_or_dl_prio(waiter->tree.prio)) | 
|---|
| 442 | return false; | 
|---|
| 443 |  | 
|---|
| 444 | return rt_waiter_node_equal(&waiter->tree, &top_waiter->tree); | 
|---|
| 445 | #else | 
|---|
| 446 | return false; | 
|---|
| 447 | #endif | 
|---|
| 448 | } | 
|---|
| 449 |  | 
|---|
| 450 | #define __node_2_waiter(node) \ | 
|---|
| 451 | rb_entry((node), struct rt_mutex_waiter, tree.entry) | 
|---|
| 452 |  | 
|---|
| 453 | static __always_inline bool __waiter_less(struct rb_node *a, const struct rb_node *b) | 
|---|
| 454 | { | 
|---|
| 455 | struct rt_mutex_waiter *aw = __node_2_waiter(a); | 
|---|
| 456 | struct rt_mutex_waiter *bw = __node_2_waiter(b); | 
|---|
| 457 |  | 
|---|
| 458 | if (rt_waiter_node_less(left: &aw->tree, right: &bw->tree)) | 
|---|
| 459 | return 1; | 
|---|
| 460 |  | 
|---|
| 461 | if (!build_ww_mutex()) | 
|---|
| 462 | return 0; | 
|---|
| 463 |  | 
|---|
| 464 | if (rt_waiter_node_less(left: &bw->tree, right: &aw->tree)) | 
|---|
| 465 | return 0; | 
|---|
| 466 |  | 
|---|
| 467 | /* NOTE: relies on waiter->ww_ctx being set before insertion */ | 
|---|
| 468 | if (aw->ww_ctx) { | 
|---|
| 469 | if (!bw->ww_ctx) | 
|---|
| 470 | return 1; | 
|---|
| 471 |  | 
|---|
| 472 | return (signed long)(aw->ww_ctx->stamp - | 
|---|
| 473 | bw->ww_ctx->stamp) < 0; | 
|---|
| 474 | } | 
|---|
| 475 |  | 
|---|
| 476 | return 0; | 
|---|
| 477 | } | 
|---|
| 478 |  | 
|---|
| 479 | static __always_inline void | 
|---|
| 480 | rt_mutex_enqueue(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter) | 
|---|
| 481 | { | 
|---|
| 482 | lockdep_assert_held(&lock->wait_lock); | 
|---|
| 483 |  | 
|---|
| 484 | rb_add_cached(node: &waiter->tree.entry, tree: &lock->waiters, less: __waiter_less); | 
|---|
| 485 | } | 
|---|
| 486 |  | 
|---|
| 487 | static __always_inline void | 
|---|
| 488 | rt_mutex_dequeue(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter) | 
|---|
| 489 | { | 
|---|
| 490 | lockdep_assert_held(&lock->wait_lock); | 
|---|
| 491 |  | 
|---|
| 492 | if (RB_EMPTY_NODE(&waiter->tree.entry)) | 
|---|
| 493 | return; | 
|---|
| 494 |  | 
|---|
| 495 | rb_erase_cached(node: &waiter->tree.entry, root: &lock->waiters); | 
|---|
| 496 | RB_CLEAR_NODE(&waiter->tree.entry); | 
|---|
| 497 | } | 
|---|
| 498 |  | 
|---|
| 499 | #define __node_2_rt_node(node) \ | 
|---|
| 500 | rb_entry((node), struct rt_waiter_node, entry) | 
|---|
| 501 |  | 
|---|
| 502 | static __always_inline bool __pi_waiter_less(struct rb_node *a, const struct rb_node *b) | 
|---|
| 503 | { | 
|---|
| 504 | return rt_waiter_node_less(__node_2_rt_node(a), __node_2_rt_node(b)); | 
|---|
| 505 | } | 
|---|
| 506 |  | 
|---|
| 507 | static __always_inline void | 
|---|
| 508 | rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(struct task_struct *task, struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter) | 
|---|
| 509 | { | 
|---|
| 510 | lockdep_assert_held(&task->pi_lock); | 
|---|
| 511 |  | 
|---|
| 512 | rb_add_cached(node: &waiter->pi_tree.entry, tree: &task->pi_waiters, less: __pi_waiter_less); | 
|---|
| 513 | } | 
|---|
| 514 |  | 
|---|
| 515 | static __always_inline void | 
|---|
| 516 | rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(struct task_struct *task, struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter) | 
|---|
| 517 | { | 
|---|
| 518 | lockdep_assert_held(&task->pi_lock); | 
|---|
| 519 |  | 
|---|
| 520 | if (RB_EMPTY_NODE(&waiter->pi_tree.entry)) | 
|---|
| 521 | return; | 
|---|
| 522 |  | 
|---|
| 523 | rb_erase_cached(node: &waiter->pi_tree.entry, root: &task->pi_waiters); | 
|---|
| 524 | RB_CLEAR_NODE(&waiter->pi_tree.entry); | 
|---|
| 525 | } | 
|---|
| 526 |  | 
|---|
| 527 | static __always_inline void rt_mutex_adjust_prio(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, | 
|---|
| 528 | struct task_struct *p) | 
|---|
| 529 | { | 
|---|
| 530 | struct task_struct *pi_task = NULL; | 
|---|
| 531 |  | 
|---|
| 532 | lockdep_assert_held(&lock->wait_lock); | 
|---|
| 533 | lockdep_assert(rt_mutex_owner(lock) == p); | 
|---|
| 534 | lockdep_assert_held(&p->pi_lock); | 
|---|
| 535 |  | 
|---|
| 536 | if (task_has_pi_waiters(p)) | 
|---|
| 537 | pi_task = task_top_pi_waiter(p)->task; | 
|---|
| 538 |  | 
|---|
| 539 | rt_mutex_setprio(p, pi_task); | 
|---|
| 540 | } | 
|---|
| 541 |  | 
|---|
| 542 | /* RT mutex specific wake_q wrappers */ | 
|---|
| 543 | static __always_inline void rt_mutex_wake_q_add_task(struct rt_wake_q_head *wqh, | 
|---|
| 544 | struct task_struct *task, | 
|---|
| 545 | unsigned int wake_state) | 
|---|
| 546 | { | 
|---|
| 547 | if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT) && wake_state == TASK_RTLOCK_WAIT) { | 
|---|
| 548 | if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING)) | 
|---|
| 549 | WARN_ON_ONCE(wqh->rtlock_task); | 
|---|
| 550 | get_task_struct(t: task); | 
|---|
| 551 | wqh->rtlock_task = task; | 
|---|
| 552 | } else { | 
|---|
| 553 | wake_q_add(head: &wqh->head, task); | 
|---|
| 554 | } | 
|---|
| 555 | } | 
|---|
| 556 |  | 
|---|
| 557 | static __always_inline void rt_mutex_wake_q_add(struct rt_wake_q_head *wqh, | 
|---|
| 558 | struct rt_mutex_waiter *w) | 
|---|
| 559 | { | 
|---|
| 560 | rt_mutex_wake_q_add_task(wqh, task: w->task, wake_state: w->wake_state); | 
|---|
| 561 | } | 
|---|
| 562 |  | 
|---|
| 563 | static __always_inline void rt_mutex_wake_up_q(struct rt_wake_q_head *wqh) | 
|---|
| 564 | { | 
|---|
| 565 | if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT) && wqh->rtlock_task) { | 
|---|
| 566 | wake_up_state(tsk: wqh->rtlock_task, TASK_RTLOCK_WAIT); | 
|---|
| 567 | put_task_struct(t: wqh->rtlock_task); | 
|---|
| 568 | wqh->rtlock_task = NULL; | 
|---|
| 569 | } | 
|---|
| 570 |  | 
|---|
| 571 | if (!wake_q_empty(head: &wqh->head)) | 
|---|
| 572 | wake_up_q(head: &wqh->head); | 
|---|
| 573 |  | 
|---|
| 574 | /* Pairs with preempt_disable() in mark_wakeup_next_waiter() */ | 
|---|
| 575 | preempt_enable(); | 
|---|
| 576 | } | 
|---|
| 577 |  | 
|---|
| 578 | /* | 
|---|
| 579 | * Deadlock detection is conditional: | 
|---|
| 580 | * | 
|---|
| 581 | * If CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES=n, deadlock detection is only conducted | 
|---|
| 582 | * if the detect argument is == RT_MUTEX_FULL_CHAINWALK. | 
|---|
| 583 | * | 
|---|
| 584 | * If CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES=y, deadlock detection is always | 
|---|
| 585 | * conducted independent of the detect argument. | 
|---|
| 586 | * | 
|---|
| 587 | * If the waiter argument is NULL this indicates the deboost path and | 
|---|
| 588 | * deadlock detection is disabled independent of the detect argument | 
|---|
| 589 | * and the config settings. | 
|---|
| 590 | */ | 
|---|
| 591 | static __always_inline bool | 
|---|
| 592 | rt_mutex_cond_detect_deadlock(struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, | 
|---|
| 593 | enum rtmutex_chainwalk chwalk) | 
|---|
| 594 | { | 
|---|
| 595 | if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES)) | 
|---|
| 596 | return waiter != NULL; | 
|---|
| 597 | return chwalk == RT_MUTEX_FULL_CHAINWALK; | 
|---|
| 598 | } | 
|---|
| 599 |  | 
|---|
| 600 | static __always_inline struct rt_mutex_base *task_blocked_on_lock(struct task_struct *p) | 
|---|
| 601 | { | 
|---|
| 602 | return p->pi_blocked_on ? p->pi_blocked_on->lock : NULL; | 
|---|
| 603 | } | 
|---|
| 604 |  | 
|---|
| 605 | /* | 
|---|
| 606 | * Adjust the priority chain. Also used for deadlock detection. | 
|---|
| 607 | * Decreases task's usage by one - may thus free the task. | 
|---|
| 608 | * | 
|---|
| 609 | * @task:	the task owning the mutex (owner) for which a chain walk is | 
|---|
| 610 | *		probably needed | 
|---|
| 611 | * @chwalk:	do we have to carry out deadlock detection? | 
|---|
| 612 | * @orig_lock:	the mutex (can be NULL if we are walking the chain to recheck | 
|---|
| 613 | *		things for a task that has just got its priority adjusted, and | 
|---|
| 614 | *		is waiting on a mutex) | 
|---|
| 615 | * @next_lock:	the mutex on which the owner of @orig_lock was blocked before | 
|---|
| 616 | *		we dropped its pi_lock. Is never dereferenced, only used for | 
|---|
| 617 | *		comparison to detect lock chain changes. | 
|---|
| 618 | * @orig_waiter: rt_mutex_waiter struct for the task that has just donated | 
|---|
| 619 | *		its priority to the mutex owner (can be NULL in the case | 
|---|
| 620 | *		depicted above or if the top waiter is gone away and we are | 
|---|
| 621 | *		actually deboosting the owner) | 
|---|
| 622 | * @top_task:	the current top waiter | 
|---|
| 623 | * | 
|---|
| 624 | * Returns 0 or -EDEADLK. | 
|---|
| 625 | * | 
|---|
| 626 | * Chain walk basics and protection scope | 
|---|
| 627 | * | 
|---|
| 628 | * [R] refcount on task | 
|---|
| 629 | * [Pn] task->pi_lock held | 
|---|
| 630 | * [L] rtmutex->wait_lock held | 
|---|
| 631 | * | 
|---|
| 632 | * Normal locking order: | 
|---|
| 633 | * | 
|---|
| 634 | *   rtmutex->wait_lock | 
|---|
| 635 | *     task->pi_lock | 
|---|
| 636 | * | 
|---|
| 637 | * Step	Description				Protected by | 
|---|
| 638 | *	function arguments: | 
|---|
| 639 | *	@task					[R] | 
|---|
| 640 | *	@orig_lock if != NULL			@top_task is blocked on it | 
|---|
| 641 | *	@next_lock				Unprotected. Cannot be | 
|---|
| 642 | *						dereferenced. Only used for | 
|---|
| 643 | *						comparison. | 
|---|
| 644 | *	@orig_waiter if != NULL			@top_task is blocked on it | 
|---|
| 645 | *	@top_task				current, or in case of proxy | 
|---|
| 646 | *						locking protected by calling | 
|---|
| 647 | *						code | 
|---|
| 648 | *	again: | 
|---|
| 649 | *	  loop_sanity_check(); | 
|---|
| 650 | *	retry: | 
|---|
| 651 | * [1]	  lock(task->pi_lock);			[R] acquire [P1] | 
|---|
| 652 | * [2]	  waiter = task->pi_blocked_on;		[P1] | 
|---|
| 653 | * [3]	  check_exit_conditions_1();		[P1] | 
|---|
| 654 | * [4]	  lock = waiter->lock;			[P1] | 
|---|
| 655 | * [5]	  if (!try_lock(lock->wait_lock)) {	[P1] try to acquire [L] | 
|---|
| 656 | *	    unlock(task->pi_lock);		release [P1] | 
|---|
| 657 | *	    goto retry; | 
|---|
| 658 | *	  } | 
|---|
| 659 | * [6]	  check_exit_conditions_2();		[P1] + [L] | 
|---|
| 660 | * [7]	  requeue_lock_waiter(lock, waiter);	[P1] + [L] | 
|---|
| 661 | * [8]	  unlock(task->pi_lock);		release [P1] | 
|---|
| 662 | *	  put_task_struct(task);		release [R] | 
|---|
| 663 | * [9]	  check_exit_conditions_3();		[L] | 
|---|
| 664 | * [10]	  task = owner(lock);			[L] | 
|---|
| 665 | *	  get_task_struct(task);		[L] acquire [R] | 
|---|
| 666 | *	  lock(task->pi_lock);			[L] acquire [P2] | 
|---|
| 667 | * [11]	  requeue_pi_waiter(tsk, waiters(lock));[P2] + [L] | 
|---|
| 668 | * [12]	  check_exit_conditions_4();		[P2] + [L] | 
|---|
| 669 | * [13]	  unlock(task->pi_lock);		release [P2] | 
|---|
| 670 | *	  unlock(lock->wait_lock);		release [L] | 
|---|
| 671 | *	  goto again; | 
|---|
| 672 | * | 
|---|
| 673 | * Where P1 is the blocking task and P2 is the lock owner; going up one step | 
|---|
| 674 | * the owner becomes the next blocked task etc.. | 
|---|
| 675 | * | 
|---|
| 676 | * | 
|---|
| 677 | */ | 
|---|
| 678 | static int __sched rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task, | 
|---|
| 679 | enum rtmutex_chainwalk chwalk, | 
|---|
| 680 | struct rt_mutex_base *orig_lock, | 
|---|
| 681 | struct rt_mutex_base *next_lock, | 
|---|
| 682 | struct rt_mutex_waiter *orig_waiter, | 
|---|
| 683 | struct task_struct *top_task) | 
|---|
| 684 | { | 
|---|
| 685 | struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, *top_waiter = orig_waiter; | 
|---|
| 686 | struct rt_mutex_waiter *prerequeue_top_waiter; | 
|---|
| 687 | int ret = 0, depth = 0; | 
|---|
| 688 | struct rt_mutex_base *lock; | 
|---|
| 689 | bool detect_deadlock; | 
|---|
| 690 | bool requeue = true; | 
|---|
| 691 |  | 
|---|
| 692 | detect_deadlock = rt_mutex_cond_detect_deadlock(waiter: orig_waiter, chwalk); | 
|---|
| 693 |  | 
|---|
| 694 | /* | 
|---|
| 695 | * The (de)boosting is a step by step approach with a lot of | 
|---|
| 696 | * pitfalls. We want this to be preemptible and we want hold a | 
|---|
| 697 | * maximum of two locks per step. So we have to check | 
|---|
| 698 | * carefully whether things change under us. | 
|---|
| 699 | */ | 
|---|
| 700 | again: | 
|---|
| 701 | /* | 
|---|
| 702 | * We limit the lock chain length for each invocation. | 
|---|
| 703 | */ | 
|---|
| 704 | if (++depth > max_lock_depth) { | 
|---|
| 705 | static int prev_max; | 
|---|
| 706 |  | 
|---|
| 707 | /* | 
|---|
| 708 | * Print this only once. If the admin changes the limit, | 
|---|
| 709 | * print a new message when reaching the limit again. | 
|---|
| 710 | */ | 
|---|
| 711 | if (prev_max != max_lock_depth) { | 
|---|
| 712 | prev_max = max_lock_depth; | 
|---|
| 713 | printk(KERN_WARNING "Maximum lock depth %d reached " | 
|---|
| 714 | "task: %s (%d)\n", max_lock_depth, | 
|---|
| 715 | top_task->comm, task_pid_nr(top_task)); | 
|---|
| 716 | } | 
|---|
| 717 | put_task_struct(t: task); | 
|---|
| 718 |  | 
|---|
| 719 | return -EDEADLK; | 
|---|
| 720 | } | 
|---|
| 721 |  | 
|---|
| 722 | /* | 
|---|
| 723 | * We are fully preemptible here and only hold the refcount on | 
|---|
| 724 | * @task. So everything can have changed under us since the | 
|---|
| 725 | * caller or our own code below (goto retry/again) dropped all | 
|---|
| 726 | * locks. | 
|---|
| 727 | */ | 
|---|
| 728 | retry: | 
|---|
| 729 | /* | 
|---|
| 730 | * [1] Task cannot go away as we did a get_task() before ! | 
|---|
| 731 | */ | 
|---|
| 732 | raw_spin_lock_irq(&task->pi_lock); | 
|---|
| 733 |  | 
|---|
| 734 | /* | 
|---|
| 735 | * [2] Get the waiter on which @task is blocked on. | 
|---|
| 736 | */ | 
|---|
| 737 | waiter = task->pi_blocked_on; | 
|---|
| 738 |  | 
|---|
| 739 | /* | 
|---|
| 740 | * [3] check_exit_conditions_1() protected by task->pi_lock. | 
|---|
| 741 | */ | 
|---|
| 742 |  | 
|---|
| 743 | /* | 
|---|
| 744 | * Check whether the end of the boosting chain has been | 
|---|
| 745 | * reached or the state of the chain has changed while we | 
|---|
| 746 | * dropped the locks. | 
|---|
| 747 | */ | 
|---|
| 748 | if (!waiter) | 
|---|
| 749 | goto out_unlock_pi; | 
|---|
| 750 |  | 
|---|
| 751 | /* | 
|---|
| 752 | * Check the orig_waiter state. After we dropped the locks, | 
|---|
| 753 | * the previous owner of the lock might have released the lock. | 
|---|
| 754 | */ | 
|---|
| 755 | if (orig_waiter && !rt_mutex_owner(lock: orig_lock)) | 
|---|
| 756 | goto out_unlock_pi; | 
|---|
| 757 |  | 
|---|
| 758 | /* | 
|---|
| 759 | * We dropped all locks after taking a refcount on @task, so | 
|---|
| 760 | * the task might have moved on in the lock chain or even left | 
|---|
| 761 | * the chain completely and blocks now on an unrelated lock or | 
|---|
| 762 | * on @orig_lock. | 
|---|
| 763 | * | 
|---|
| 764 | * We stored the lock on which @task was blocked in @next_lock, | 
|---|
| 765 | * so we can detect the chain change. | 
|---|
| 766 | */ | 
|---|
| 767 | if (next_lock != waiter->lock) | 
|---|
| 768 | goto out_unlock_pi; | 
|---|
| 769 |  | 
|---|
| 770 | /* | 
|---|
| 771 | * There could be 'spurious' loops in the lock graph due to ww_mutex, | 
|---|
| 772 | * consider: | 
|---|
| 773 | * | 
|---|
| 774 | *   P1: A, ww_A, ww_B | 
|---|
| 775 | *   P2: ww_B, ww_A | 
|---|
| 776 | *   P3: A | 
|---|
| 777 | * | 
|---|
| 778 | * P3 should not return -EDEADLK because it gets trapped in the cycle | 
|---|
| 779 | * created by P1 and P2 (which will resolve -- and runs into | 
|---|
| 780 | * max_lock_depth above). Therefore disable detect_deadlock such that | 
|---|
| 781 | * the below termination condition can trigger once all relevant tasks | 
|---|
| 782 | * are boosted. | 
|---|
| 783 | * | 
|---|
| 784 | * Even when we start with ww_mutex we can disable deadlock detection, | 
|---|
| 785 | * since we would supress a ww_mutex induced deadlock at [6] anyway. | 
|---|
| 786 | * Supressing it here however is not sufficient since we might still | 
|---|
| 787 | * hit [6] due to adjustment driven iteration. | 
|---|
| 788 | * | 
|---|
| 789 | * NOTE: if someone were to create a deadlock between 2 ww_classes we'd | 
|---|
| 790 | * utterly fail to report it; lockdep should. | 
|---|
| 791 | */ | 
|---|
| 792 | if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT) && waiter->ww_ctx && detect_deadlock) | 
|---|
| 793 | detect_deadlock = false; | 
|---|
| 794 |  | 
|---|
| 795 | /* | 
|---|
| 796 | * Drop out, when the task has no waiters. Note, | 
|---|
| 797 | * top_waiter can be NULL, when we are in the deboosting | 
|---|
| 798 | * mode! | 
|---|
| 799 | */ | 
|---|
| 800 | if (top_waiter) { | 
|---|
| 801 | if (!task_has_pi_waiters(p: task)) | 
|---|
| 802 | goto out_unlock_pi; | 
|---|
| 803 | /* | 
|---|
| 804 | * If deadlock detection is off, we stop here if we | 
|---|
| 805 | * are not the top pi waiter of the task. If deadlock | 
|---|
| 806 | * detection is enabled we continue, but stop the | 
|---|
| 807 | * requeueing in the chain walk. | 
|---|
| 808 | */ | 
|---|
| 809 | if (top_waiter != task_top_pi_waiter(p: task)) { | 
|---|
| 810 | if (!detect_deadlock) | 
|---|
| 811 | goto out_unlock_pi; | 
|---|
| 812 | else | 
|---|
| 813 | requeue = false; | 
|---|
| 814 | } | 
|---|
| 815 | } | 
|---|
| 816 |  | 
|---|
| 817 | /* | 
|---|
| 818 | * If the waiter priority is the same as the task priority | 
|---|
| 819 | * then there is no further priority adjustment necessary.  If | 
|---|
| 820 | * deadlock detection is off, we stop the chain walk. If its | 
|---|
| 821 | * enabled we continue, but stop the requeueing in the chain | 
|---|
| 822 | * walk. | 
|---|
| 823 | */ | 
|---|
| 824 | if (rt_waiter_node_equal(left: &waiter->tree, task_to_waiter_node(task))) { | 
|---|
| 825 | if (!detect_deadlock) | 
|---|
| 826 | goto out_unlock_pi; | 
|---|
| 827 | else | 
|---|
| 828 | requeue = false; | 
|---|
| 829 | } | 
|---|
| 830 |  | 
|---|
| 831 | /* | 
|---|
| 832 | * [4] Get the next lock; per holding task->pi_lock we can't unblock | 
|---|
| 833 | * and guarantee @lock's existence. | 
|---|
| 834 | */ | 
|---|
| 835 | lock = waiter->lock; | 
|---|
| 836 | /* | 
|---|
| 837 | * [5] We need to trylock here as we are holding task->pi_lock, | 
|---|
| 838 | * which is the reverse lock order versus the other rtmutex | 
|---|
| 839 | * operations. | 
|---|
| 840 | * | 
|---|
| 841 | * Per the above, holding task->pi_lock guarantees lock exists, so | 
|---|
| 842 | * inverting this lock order is infeasible from a life-time | 
|---|
| 843 | * perspective. | 
|---|
| 844 | */ | 
|---|
| 845 | if (!raw_spin_trylock(&lock->wait_lock)) { | 
|---|
| 846 | raw_spin_unlock_irq(&task->pi_lock); | 
|---|
| 847 | cpu_relax(); | 
|---|
| 848 | goto retry; | 
|---|
| 849 | } | 
|---|
| 850 |  | 
|---|
| 851 | /* | 
|---|
| 852 | * [6] check_exit_conditions_2() protected by task->pi_lock and | 
|---|
| 853 | * lock->wait_lock. | 
|---|
| 854 | * | 
|---|
| 855 | * Deadlock detection. If the lock is the same as the original | 
|---|
| 856 | * lock which caused us to walk the lock chain or if the | 
|---|
| 857 | * current lock is owned by the task which initiated the chain | 
|---|
| 858 | * walk, we detected a deadlock. | 
|---|
| 859 | */ | 
|---|
| 860 | if (lock == orig_lock || rt_mutex_owner(lock) == top_task) { | 
|---|
| 861 | ret = -EDEADLK; | 
|---|
| 862 |  | 
|---|
| 863 | /* | 
|---|
| 864 | * When the deadlock is due to ww_mutex; also see above. Don't | 
|---|
| 865 | * report the deadlock and instead let the ww_mutex wound/die | 
|---|
| 866 | * logic pick which of the contending threads gets -EDEADLK. | 
|---|
| 867 | * | 
|---|
| 868 | * NOTE: assumes the cycle only contains a single ww_class; any | 
|---|
| 869 | * other configuration and we fail to report; also, see | 
|---|
| 870 | * lockdep. | 
|---|
| 871 | */ | 
|---|
| 872 | if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT) && orig_waiter && orig_waiter->ww_ctx) | 
|---|
| 873 | ret = 0; | 
|---|
| 874 |  | 
|---|
| 875 | raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock); | 
|---|
| 876 | goto out_unlock_pi; | 
|---|
| 877 | } | 
|---|
| 878 |  | 
|---|
| 879 | /* | 
|---|
| 880 | * If we just follow the lock chain for deadlock detection, no | 
|---|
| 881 | * need to do all the requeue operations. To avoid a truckload | 
|---|
| 882 | * of conditionals around the various places below, just do the | 
|---|
| 883 | * minimum chain walk checks. | 
|---|
| 884 | */ | 
|---|
| 885 | if (!requeue) { | 
|---|
| 886 | /* | 
|---|
| 887 | * No requeue[7] here. Just release @task [8] | 
|---|
| 888 | */ | 
|---|
| 889 | raw_spin_unlock(&task->pi_lock); | 
|---|
| 890 | put_task_struct(t: task); | 
|---|
| 891 |  | 
|---|
| 892 | /* | 
|---|
| 893 | * [9] check_exit_conditions_3 protected by lock->wait_lock. | 
|---|
| 894 | * If there is no owner of the lock, end of chain. | 
|---|
| 895 | */ | 
|---|
| 896 | if (!rt_mutex_owner(lock)) { | 
|---|
| 897 | raw_spin_unlock_irq(&lock->wait_lock); | 
|---|
| 898 | return 0; | 
|---|
| 899 | } | 
|---|
| 900 |  | 
|---|
| 901 | /* [10] Grab the next task, i.e. owner of @lock */ | 
|---|
| 902 | task = get_task_struct(t: rt_mutex_owner(lock)); | 
|---|
| 903 | raw_spin_lock(&task->pi_lock); | 
|---|
| 904 |  | 
|---|
| 905 | /* | 
|---|
| 906 | * No requeue [11] here. We just do deadlock detection. | 
|---|
| 907 | * | 
|---|
| 908 | * [12] Store whether owner is blocked | 
|---|
| 909 | * itself. Decision is made after dropping the locks | 
|---|
| 910 | */ | 
|---|
| 911 | next_lock = task_blocked_on_lock(p: task); | 
|---|
| 912 | /* | 
|---|
| 913 | * Get the top waiter for the next iteration | 
|---|
| 914 | */ | 
|---|
| 915 | top_waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock); | 
|---|
| 916 |  | 
|---|
| 917 | /* [13] Drop locks */ | 
|---|
| 918 | raw_spin_unlock(&task->pi_lock); | 
|---|
| 919 | raw_spin_unlock_irq(&lock->wait_lock); | 
|---|
| 920 |  | 
|---|
| 921 | /* If owner is not blocked, end of chain. */ | 
|---|
| 922 | if (!next_lock) | 
|---|
| 923 | goto out_put_task; | 
|---|
| 924 | goto again; | 
|---|
| 925 | } | 
|---|
| 926 |  | 
|---|
| 927 | /* | 
|---|
| 928 | * Store the current top waiter before doing the requeue | 
|---|
| 929 | * operation on @lock. We need it for the boost/deboost | 
|---|
| 930 | * decision below. | 
|---|
| 931 | */ | 
|---|
| 932 | prerequeue_top_waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock); | 
|---|
| 933 |  | 
|---|
| 934 | /* [7] Requeue the waiter in the lock waiter tree. */ | 
|---|
| 935 | rt_mutex_dequeue(lock, waiter); | 
|---|
| 936 |  | 
|---|
| 937 | /* | 
|---|
| 938 | * Update the waiter prio fields now that we're dequeued. | 
|---|
| 939 | * | 
|---|
| 940 | * These values can have changed through either: | 
|---|
| 941 | * | 
|---|
| 942 | *   sys_sched_set_scheduler() / sys_sched_setattr() | 
|---|
| 943 | * | 
|---|
| 944 | * or | 
|---|
| 945 | * | 
|---|
| 946 | *   DL CBS enforcement advancing the effective deadline. | 
|---|
| 947 | */ | 
|---|
| 948 | waiter_update_prio(waiter, task); | 
|---|
| 949 |  | 
|---|
| 950 | rt_mutex_enqueue(lock, waiter); | 
|---|
| 951 |  | 
|---|
| 952 | /* | 
|---|
| 953 | * [8] Release the (blocking) task in preparation for | 
|---|
| 954 | * taking the owner task in [10]. | 
|---|
| 955 | * | 
|---|
| 956 | * Since we hold lock->waiter_lock, task cannot unblock, even if we | 
|---|
| 957 | * release task->pi_lock. | 
|---|
| 958 | */ | 
|---|
| 959 | raw_spin_unlock(&task->pi_lock); | 
|---|
| 960 | put_task_struct(t: task); | 
|---|
| 961 |  | 
|---|
| 962 | /* | 
|---|
| 963 | * [9] check_exit_conditions_3 protected by lock->wait_lock. | 
|---|
| 964 | * | 
|---|
| 965 | * We must abort the chain walk if there is no lock owner even | 
|---|
| 966 | * in the dead lock detection case, as we have nothing to | 
|---|
| 967 | * follow here. This is the end of the chain we are walking. | 
|---|
| 968 | */ | 
|---|
| 969 | if (!rt_mutex_owner(lock)) { | 
|---|
| 970 | /* | 
|---|
| 971 | * If the requeue [7] above changed the top waiter, | 
|---|
| 972 | * then we need to wake the new top waiter up to try | 
|---|
| 973 | * to get the lock. | 
|---|
| 974 | */ | 
|---|
| 975 | top_waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock); | 
|---|
| 976 | if (prerequeue_top_waiter != top_waiter) | 
|---|
| 977 | wake_up_state(tsk: top_waiter->task, state: top_waiter->wake_state); | 
|---|
| 978 | raw_spin_unlock_irq(&lock->wait_lock); | 
|---|
| 979 | return 0; | 
|---|
| 980 | } | 
|---|
| 981 |  | 
|---|
| 982 | /* | 
|---|
| 983 | * [10] Grab the next task, i.e. the owner of @lock | 
|---|
| 984 | * | 
|---|
| 985 | * Per holding lock->wait_lock and checking for !owner above, there | 
|---|
| 986 | * must be an owner and it cannot go away. | 
|---|
| 987 | */ | 
|---|
| 988 | task = get_task_struct(t: rt_mutex_owner(lock)); | 
|---|
| 989 | raw_spin_lock(&task->pi_lock); | 
|---|
| 990 |  | 
|---|
| 991 | /* [11] requeue the pi waiters if necessary */ | 
|---|
| 992 | if (waiter == rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)) { | 
|---|
| 993 | /* | 
|---|
| 994 | * The waiter became the new top (highest priority) | 
|---|
| 995 | * waiter on the lock. Replace the previous top waiter | 
|---|
| 996 | * in the owner tasks pi waiters tree with this waiter | 
|---|
| 997 | * and adjust the priority of the owner. | 
|---|
| 998 | */ | 
|---|
| 999 | rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(task, waiter: prerequeue_top_waiter); | 
|---|
| 1000 | waiter_clone_prio(waiter, task); | 
|---|
| 1001 | rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(task, waiter); | 
|---|
| 1002 | rt_mutex_adjust_prio(lock, p: task); | 
|---|
| 1003 |  | 
|---|
| 1004 | } else if (prerequeue_top_waiter == waiter) { | 
|---|
| 1005 | /* | 
|---|
| 1006 | * The waiter was the top waiter on the lock, but is | 
|---|
| 1007 | * no longer the top priority waiter. Replace waiter in | 
|---|
| 1008 | * the owner tasks pi waiters tree with the new top | 
|---|
| 1009 | * (highest priority) waiter and adjust the priority | 
|---|
| 1010 | * of the owner. | 
|---|
| 1011 | * The new top waiter is stored in @waiter so that | 
|---|
| 1012 | * @waiter == @top_waiter evaluates to true below and | 
|---|
| 1013 | * we continue to deboost the rest of the chain. | 
|---|
| 1014 | */ | 
|---|
| 1015 | rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(task, waiter); | 
|---|
| 1016 | waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock); | 
|---|
| 1017 | waiter_clone_prio(waiter, task); | 
|---|
| 1018 | rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(task, waiter); | 
|---|
| 1019 | rt_mutex_adjust_prio(lock, p: task); | 
|---|
| 1020 | } else { | 
|---|
| 1021 | /* | 
|---|
| 1022 | * Nothing changed. No need to do any priority | 
|---|
| 1023 | * adjustment. | 
|---|
| 1024 | */ | 
|---|
| 1025 | } | 
|---|
| 1026 |  | 
|---|
| 1027 | /* | 
|---|
| 1028 | * [12] check_exit_conditions_4() protected by task->pi_lock | 
|---|
| 1029 | * and lock->wait_lock. The actual decisions are made after we | 
|---|
| 1030 | * dropped the locks. | 
|---|
| 1031 | * | 
|---|
| 1032 | * Check whether the task which owns the current lock is pi | 
|---|
| 1033 | * blocked itself. If yes we store a pointer to the lock for | 
|---|
| 1034 | * the lock chain change detection above. After we dropped | 
|---|
| 1035 | * task->pi_lock next_lock cannot be dereferenced anymore. | 
|---|
| 1036 | */ | 
|---|
| 1037 | next_lock = task_blocked_on_lock(p: task); | 
|---|
| 1038 | /* | 
|---|
| 1039 | * Store the top waiter of @lock for the end of chain walk | 
|---|
| 1040 | * decision below. | 
|---|
| 1041 | */ | 
|---|
| 1042 | top_waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock); | 
|---|
| 1043 |  | 
|---|
| 1044 | /* [13] Drop the locks */ | 
|---|
| 1045 | raw_spin_unlock(&task->pi_lock); | 
|---|
| 1046 | raw_spin_unlock_irq(&lock->wait_lock); | 
|---|
| 1047 |  | 
|---|
| 1048 | /* | 
|---|
| 1049 | * Make the actual exit decisions [12], based on the stored | 
|---|
| 1050 | * values. | 
|---|
| 1051 | * | 
|---|
| 1052 | * We reached the end of the lock chain. Stop right here. No | 
|---|
| 1053 | * point to go back just to figure that out. | 
|---|
| 1054 | */ | 
|---|
| 1055 | if (!next_lock) | 
|---|
| 1056 | goto out_put_task; | 
|---|
| 1057 |  | 
|---|
| 1058 | /* | 
|---|
| 1059 | * If the current waiter is not the top waiter on the lock, | 
|---|
| 1060 | * then we can stop the chain walk here if we are not in full | 
|---|
| 1061 | * deadlock detection mode. | 
|---|
| 1062 | */ | 
|---|
| 1063 | if (!detect_deadlock && waiter != top_waiter) | 
|---|
| 1064 | goto out_put_task; | 
|---|
| 1065 |  | 
|---|
| 1066 | goto again; | 
|---|
| 1067 |  | 
|---|
| 1068 | out_unlock_pi: | 
|---|
| 1069 | raw_spin_unlock_irq(&task->pi_lock); | 
|---|
| 1070 | out_put_task: | 
|---|
| 1071 | put_task_struct(t: task); | 
|---|
| 1072 |  | 
|---|
| 1073 | return ret; | 
|---|
| 1074 | } | 
|---|
| 1075 |  | 
|---|
| 1076 | /* | 
|---|
| 1077 | * Try to take an rt-mutex | 
|---|
| 1078 | * | 
|---|
| 1079 | * Must be called with lock->wait_lock held and interrupts disabled | 
|---|
| 1080 | * | 
|---|
| 1081 | * @lock:   The lock to be acquired. | 
|---|
| 1082 | * @task:   The task which wants to acquire the lock | 
|---|
| 1083 | * @waiter: The waiter that is queued to the lock's wait tree if the | 
|---|
| 1084 | *	    callsite called task_blocked_on_lock(), otherwise NULL | 
|---|
| 1085 | */ | 
|---|
| 1086 | static int __sched | 
|---|
| 1087 | try_to_take_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, struct task_struct *task, | 
|---|
| 1088 | struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter) | 
|---|
| 1089 | { | 
|---|
| 1090 | lockdep_assert_held(&lock->wait_lock); | 
|---|
| 1091 |  | 
|---|
| 1092 | /* | 
|---|
| 1093 | * Before testing whether we can acquire @lock, we set the | 
|---|
| 1094 | * RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS bit in @lock->owner. This forces all | 
|---|
| 1095 | * other tasks which try to modify @lock into the slow path | 
|---|
| 1096 | * and they serialize on @lock->wait_lock. | 
|---|
| 1097 | * | 
|---|
| 1098 | * The RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS bit can have a transitional state | 
|---|
| 1099 | * as explained at the top of this file if and only if: | 
|---|
| 1100 | * | 
|---|
| 1101 | * - There is a lock owner. The caller must fixup the | 
|---|
| 1102 | *   transient state if it does a trylock or leaves the lock | 
|---|
| 1103 | *   function due to a signal or timeout. | 
|---|
| 1104 | * | 
|---|
| 1105 | * - @task acquires the lock and there are no other | 
|---|
| 1106 | *   waiters. This is undone in rt_mutex_set_owner(@task) at | 
|---|
| 1107 | *   the end of this function. | 
|---|
| 1108 | */ | 
|---|
| 1109 | mark_rt_mutex_waiters(lock); | 
|---|
| 1110 |  | 
|---|
| 1111 | /* | 
|---|
| 1112 | * If @lock has an owner, give up. | 
|---|
| 1113 | */ | 
|---|
| 1114 | if (rt_mutex_owner(lock)) | 
|---|
| 1115 | return 0; | 
|---|
| 1116 |  | 
|---|
| 1117 | /* | 
|---|
| 1118 | * If @waiter != NULL, @task has already enqueued the waiter | 
|---|
| 1119 | * into @lock waiter tree. If @waiter == NULL then this is a | 
|---|
| 1120 | * trylock attempt. | 
|---|
| 1121 | */ | 
|---|
| 1122 | if (waiter) { | 
|---|
| 1123 | struct rt_mutex_waiter *top_waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock); | 
|---|
| 1124 |  | 
|---|
| 1125 | /* | 
|---|
| 1126 | * If waiter is the highest priority waiter of @lock, | 
|---|
| 1127 | * or allowed to steal it, take it over. | 
|---|
| 1128 | */ | 
|---|
| 1129 | if (waiter == top_waiter || rt_mutex_steal(waiter, top_waiter)) { | 
|---|
| 1130 | /* | 
|---|
| 1131 | * We can acquire the lock. Remove the waiter from the | 
|---|
| 1132 | * lock waiters tree. | 
|---|
| 1133 | */ | 
|---|
| 1134 | rt_mutex_dequeue(lock, waiter); | 
|---|
| 1135 | } else { | 
|---|
| 1136 | return 0; | 
|---|
| 1137 | } | 
|---|
| 1138 | } else { | 
|---|
| 1139 | /* | 
|---|
| 1140 | * If the lock has waiters already we check whether @task is | 
|---|
| 1141 | * eligible to take over the lock. | 
|---|
| 1142 | * | 
|---|
| 1143 | * If there are no other waiters, @task can acquire | 
|---|
| 1144 | * the lock.  @task->pi_blocked_on is NULL, so it does | 
|---|
| 1145 | * not need to be dequeued. | 
|---|
| 1146 | */ | 
|---|
| 1147 | if (rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock)) { | 
|---|
| 1148 | /* Check whether the trylock can steal it. */ | 
|---|
| 1149 | if (!rt_mutex_steal(task_to_waiter(task), | 
|---|
| 1150 | top_waiter: rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock))) | 
|---|
| 1151 | return 0; | 
|---|
| 1152 |  | 
|---|
| 1153 | /* | 
|---|
| 1154 | * The current top waiter stays enqueued. We | 
|---|
| 1155 | * don't have to change anything in the lock | 
|---|
| 1156 | * waiters order. | 
|---|
| 1157 | */ | 
|---|
| 1158 | } else { | 
|---|
| 1159 | /* | 
|---|
| 1160 | * No waiters. Take the lock without the | 
|---|
| 1161 | * pi_lock dance.@task->pi_blocked_on is NULL | 
|---|
| 1162 | * and we have no waiters to enqueue in @task | 
|---|
| 1163 | * pi waiters tree. | 
|---|
| 1164 | */ | 
|---|
| 1165 | goto takeit; | 
|---|
| 1166 | } | 
|---|
| 1167 | } | 
|---|
| 1168 |  | 
|---|
| 1169 | /* | 
|---|
| 1170 | * Clear @task->pi_blocked_on. Requires protection by | 
|---|
| 1171 | * @task->pi_lock. Redundant operation for the @waiter == NULL | 
|---|
| 1172 | * case, but conditionals are more expensive than a redundant | 
|---|
| 1173 | * store. | 
|---|
| 1174 | */ | 
|---|
| 1175 | raw_spin_lock(&task->pi_lock); | 
|---|
| 1176 | task->pi_blocked_on = NULL; | 
|---|
| 1177 | /* | 
|---|
| 1178 | * Finish the lock acquisition. @task is the new owner. If | 
|---|
| 1179 | * other waiters exist we have to insert the highest priority | 
|---|
| 1180 | * waiter into @task->pi_waiters tree. | 
|---|
| 1181 | */ | 
|---|
| 1182 | if (rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock)) | 
|---|
| 1183 | rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(task, waiter: rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)); | 
|---|
| 1184 | raw_spin_unlock(&task->pi_lock); | 
|---|
| 1185 |  | 
|---|
| 1186 | takeit: | 
|---|
| 1187 | /* | 
|---|
| 1188 | * This either preserves the RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS bit if there | 
|---|
| 1189 | * are still waiters or clears it. | 
|---|
| 1190 | */ | 
|---|
| 1191 | rt_mutex_set_owner(lock, owner: task); | 
|---|
| 1192 |  | 
|---|
| 1193 | return 1; | 
|---|
| 1194 | } | 
|---|
| 1195 |  | 
|---|
| 1196 | /* | 
|---|
| 1197 | * Task blocks on lock. | 
|---|
| 1198 | * | 
|---|
| 1199 | * Prepare waiter and propagate pi chain | 
|---|
| 1200 | * | 
|---|
| 1201 | * This must be called with lock->wait_lock held and interrupts disabled | 
|---|
| 1202 | */ | 
|---|
| 1203 | static int __sched task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, | 
|---|
| 1204 | struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, | 
|---|
| 1205 | struct task_struct *task, | 
|---|
| 1206 | struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx, | 
|---|
| 1207 | enum rtmutex_chainwalk chwalk, | 
|---|
| 1208 | struct wake_q_head *wake_q) | 
|---|
| 1209 | { | 
|---|
| 1210 | struct task_struct *owner = rt_mutex_owner(lock); | 
|---|
| 1211 | struct rt_mutex_waiter *top_waiter = waiter; | 
|---|
| 1212 | struct rt_mutex_base *next_lock; | 
|---|
| 1213 | int chain_walk = 0, res; | 
|---|
| 1214 |  | 
|---|
| 1215 | lockdep_assert_held(&lock->wait_lock); | 
|---|
| 1216 |  | 
|---|
| 1217 | /* | 
|---|
| 1218 | * Early deadlock detection. We really don't want the task to | 
|---|
| 1219 | * enqueue on itself just to untangle the mess later. It's not | 
|---|
| 1220 | * only an optimization. We drop the locks, so another waiter | 
|---|
| 1221 | * can come in before the chain walk detects the deadlock. So | 
|---|
| 1222 | * the other will detect the deadlock and return -EDEADLOCK, | 
|---|
| 1223 | * which is wrong, as the other waiter is not in a deadlock | 
|---|
| 1224 | * situation. | 
|---|
| 1225 | * | 
|---|
| 1226 | * Except for ww_mutex, in that case the chain walk must already deal | 
|---|
| 1227 | * with spurious cycles, see the comments at [3] and [6]. | 
|---|
| 1228 | */ | 
|---|
| 1229 | if (owner == task && !(build_ww_mutex() && ww_ctx)) | 
|---|
| 1230 | return -EDEADLK; | 
|---|
| 1231 |  | 
|---|
| 1232 | raw_spin_lock(&task->pi_lock); | 
|---|
| 1233 | waiter->task = task; | 
|---|
| 1234 | waiter->lock = lock; | 
|---|
| 1235 | waiter_update_prio(waiter, task); | 
|---|
| 1236 | waiter_clone_prio(waiter, task); | 
|---|
| 1237 |  | 
|---|
| 1238 | /* Get the top priority waiter on the lock */ | 
|---|
| 1239 | if (rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock)) | 
|---|
| 1240 | top_waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock); | 
|---|
| 1241 | rt_mutex_enqueue(lock, waiter); | 
|---|
| 1242 |  | 
|---|
| 1243 | task->pi_blocked_on = waiter; | 
|---|
| 1244 |  | 
|---|
| 1245 | raw_spin_unlock(&task->pi_lock); | 
|---|
| 1246 |  | 
|---|
| 1247 | if (build_ww_mutex() && ww_ctx) { | 
|---|
| 1248 | struct rt_mutex *rtm; | 
|---|
| 1249 |  | 
|---|
| 1250 | /* Check whether the waiter should back out immediately */ | 
|---|
| 1251 | rtm = container_of(lock, struct rt_mutex, rtmutex); | 
|---|
| 1252 | res = __ww_mutex_add_waiter(waiter, lock: rtm, ww_ctx, wake_q); | 
|---|
| 1253 | if (res) { | 
|---|
| 1254 | raw_spin_lock(&task->pi_lock); | 
|---|
| 1255 | rt_mutex_dequeue(lock, waiter); | 
|---|
| 1256 | task->pi_blocked_on = NULL; | 
|---|
| 1257 | raw_spin_unlock(&task->pi_lock); | 
|---|
| 1258 | return res; | 
|---|
| 1259 | } | 
|---|
| 1260 | } | 
|---|
| 1261 |  | 
|---|
| 1262 | if (!owner) | 
|---|
| 1263 | return 0; | 
|---|
| 1264 |  | 
|---|
| 1265 | raw_spin_lock(&owner->pi_lock); | 
|---|
| 1266 | if (waiter == rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)) { | 
|---|
| 1267 | rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(task: owner, waiter: top_waiter); | 
|---|
| 1268 | rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(task: owner, waiter); | 
|---|
| 1269 |  | 
|---|
| 1270 | rt_mutex_adjust_prio(lock, p: owner); | 
|---|
| 1271 | if (owner->pi_blocked_on) | 
|---|
| 1272 | chain_walk = 1; | 
|---|
| 1273 | } else if (rt_mutex_cond_detect_deadlock(waiter, chwalk)) { | 
|---|
| 1274 | chain_walk = 1; | 
|---|
| 1275 | } | 
|---|
| 1276 |  | 
|---|
| 1277 | /* Store the lock on which owner is blocked or NULL */ | 
|---|
| 1278 | next_lock = task_blocked_on_lock(p: owner); | 
|---|
| 1279 |  | 
|---|
| 1280 | raw_spin_unlock(&owner->pi_lock); | 
|---|
| 1281 | /* | 
|---|
| 1282 | * Even if full deadlock detection is on, if the owner is not | 
|---|
| 1283 | * blocked itself, we can avoid finding this out in the chain | 
|---|
| 1284 | * walk. | 
|---|
| 1285 | */ | 
|---|
| 1286 | if (!chain_walk || !next_lock) | 
|---|
| 1287 | return 0; | 
|---|
| 1288 |  | 
|---|
| 1289 | /* | 
|---|
| 1290 | * The owner can't disappear while holding a lock, | 
|---|
| 1291 | * so the owner struct is protected by wait_lock. | 
|---|
| 1292 | * Gets dropped in rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain()! | 
|---|
| 1293 | */ | 
|---|
| 1294 | get_task_struct(t: owner); | 
|---|
| 1295 |  | 
|---|
| 1296 | raw_spin_unlock_irq_wake(lock: &lock->wait_lock, wake_q); | 
|---|
| 1297 |  | 
|---|
| 1298 | res = rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(task: owner, chwalk, orig_lock: lock, | 
|---|
| 1299 | next_lock, orig_waiter: waiter, top_task: task); | 
|---|
| 1300 |  | 
|---|
| 1301 | raw_spin_lock_irq(&lock->wait_lock); | 
|---|
| 1302 |  | 
|---|
| 1303 | return res; | 
|---|
| 1304 | } | 
|---|
| 1305 |  | 
|---|
| 1306 | /* | 
|---|
| 1307 | * Remove the top waiter from the current tasks pi waiter tree and | 
|---|
| 1308 | * queue it up. | 
|---|
| 1309 | * | 
|---|
| 1310 | * Called with lock->wait_lock held and interrupts disabled. | 
|---|
| 1311 | */ | 
|---|
| 1312 | static void __sched mark_wakeup_next_waiter(struct rt_wake_q_head *wqh, | 
|---|
| 1313 | struct rt_mutex_base *lock) | 
|---|
| 1314 | { | 
|---|
| 1315 | struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter; | 
|---|
| 1316 |  | 
|---|
| 1317 | lockdep_assert_held(&lock->wait_lock); | 
|---|
| 1318 |  | 
|---|
| 1319 | raw_spin_lock(¤t->pi_lock); | 
|---|
| 1320 |  | 
|---|
| 1321 | waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock); | 
|---|
| 1322 |  | 
|---|
| 1323 | /* | 
|---|
| 1324 | * Remove it from current->pi_waiters and deboost. | 
|---|
| 1325 | * | 
|---|
| 1326 | * We must in fact deboost here in order to ensure we call | 
|---|
| 1327 | * rt_mutex_setprio() to update p->pi_top_task before the | 
|---|
| 1328 | * task unblocks. | 
|---|
| 1329 | */ | 
|---|
| 1330 | rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(current, waiter); | 
|---|
| 1331 | rt_mutex_adjust_prio(lock, current); | 
|---|
| 1332 |  | 
|---|
| 1333 | /* | 
|---|
| 1334 | * As we are waking up the top waiter, and the waiter stays | 
|---|
| 1335 | * queued on the lock until it gets the lock, this lock | 
|---|
| 1336 | * obviously has waiters. Just set the bit here and this has | 
|---|
| 1337 | * the added benefit of forcing all new tasks into the | 
|---|
| 1338 | * slow path making sure no task of lower priority than | 
|---|
| 1339 | * the top waiter can steal this lock. | 
|---|
| 1340 | */ | 
|---|
| 1341 | lock->owner = (void *) RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS; | 
|---|
| 1342 |  | 
|---|
| 1343 | /* | 
|---|
| 1344 | * We deboosted before waking the top waiter task such that we don't | 
|---|
| 1345 | * run two tasks with the 'same' priority (and ensure the | 
|---|
| 1346 | * p->pi_top_task pointer points to a blocked task). This however can | 
|---|
| 1347 | * lead to priority inversion if we would get preempted after the | 
|---|
| 1348 | * deboost but before waking our donor task, hence the preempt_disable() | 
|---|
| 1349 | * before unlock. | 
|---|
| 1350 | * | 
|---|
| 1351 | * Pairs with preempt_enable() in rt_mutex_wake_up_q(); | 
|---|
| 1352 | */ | 
|---|
| 1353 | preempt_disable(); | 
|---|
| 1354 | rt_mutex_wake_q_add(wqh, w: waiter); | 
|---|
| 1355 | raw_spin_unlock(¤t->pi_lock); | 
|---|
| 1356 | } | 
|---|
| 1357 |  | 
|---|
| 1358 | static int __sched __rt_mutex_slowtrylock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock) | 
|---|
| 1359 | { | 
|---|
| 1360 | int ret = try_to_take_rt_mutex(lock, current, NULL); | 
|---|
| 1361 |  | 
|---|
| 1362 | /* | 
|---|
| 1363 | * try_to_take_rt_mutex() sets the lock waiters bit | 
|---|
| 1364 | * unconditionally. Clean this up. | 
|---|
| 1365 | */ | 
|---|
| 1366 | fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(lock, acquire_lock: true); | 
|---|
| 1367 |  | 
|---|
| 1368 | return ret; | 
|---|
| 1369 | } | 
|---|
| 1370 |  | 
|---|
| 1371 | /* | 
|---|
| 1372 | * Slow path try-lock function: | 
|---|
| 1373 | */ | 
|---|
| 1374 | static int __sched rt_mutex_slowtrylock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock) | 
|---|
| 1375 | { | 
|---|
| 1376 | unsigned long flags; | 
|---|
| 1377 | int ret; | 
|---|
| 1378 |  | 
|---|
| 1379 | /* | 
|---|
| 1380 | * If the lock already has an owner we fail to get the lock. | 
|---|
| 1381 | * This can be done without taking the @lock->wait_lock as | 
|---|
| 1382 | * it is only being read, and this is a trylock anyway. | 
|---|
| 1383 | */ | 
|---|
| 1384 | if (rt_mutex_owner(lock)) | 
|---|
| 1385 | return 0; | 
|---|
| 1386 |  | 
|---|
| 1387 | /* | 
|---|
| 1388 | * The mutex has currently no owner. Lock the wait lock and try to | 
|---|
| 1389 | * acquire the lock. We use irqsave here to support early boot calls. | 
|---|
| 1390 | */ | 
|---|
| 1391 | raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&lock->wait_lock, flags); | 
|---|
| 1392 |  | 
|---|
| 1393 | ret = __rt_mutex_slowtrylock(lock); | 
|---|
| 1394 |  | 
|---|
| 1395 | raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lock->wait_lock, flags); | 
|---|
| 1396 |  | 
|---|
| 1397 | return ret; | 
|---|
| 1398 | } | 
|---|
| 1399 |  | 
|---|
| 1400 | static __always_inline int __rt_mutex_trylock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock) | 
|---|
| 1401 | { | 
|---|
| 1402 | if (likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg_acquire(lock, NULL, current))) | 
|---|
| 1403 | return 1; | 
|---|
| 1404 |  | 
|---|
| 1405 | return rt_mutex_slowtrylock(lock); | 
|---|
| 1406 | } | 
|---|
| 1407 |  | 
|---|
| 1408 | /* | 
|---|
| 1409 | * Slow path to release a rt-mutex. | 
|---|
| 1410 | */ | 
|---|
| 1411 | static void __sched rt_mutex_slowunlock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock) | 
|---|
| 1412 | { | 
|---|
| 1413 | DEFINE_RT_WAKE_Q(wqh); | 
|---|
| 1414 | unsigned long flags; | 
|---|
| 1415 |  | 
|---|
| 1416 | /* irqsave required to support early boot calls */ | 
|---|
| 1417 | raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&lock->wait_lock, flags); | 
|---|
| 1418 |  | 
|---|
| 1419 | debug_rt_mutex_unlock(lock); | 
|---|
| 1420 |  | 
|---|
| 1421 | /* | 
|---|
| 1422 | * We must be careful here if the fast path is enabled. If we | 
|---|
| 1423 | * have no waiters queued we cannot set owner to NULL here | 
|---|
| 1424 | * because of: | 
|---|
| 1425 | * | 
|---|
| 1426 | * foo->lock->owner = NULL; | 
|---|
| 1427 | *			rtmutex_lock(foo->lock);   <- fast path | 
|---|
| 1428 | *			free = atomic_dec_and_test(foo->refcnt); | 
|---|
| 1429 | *			rtmutex_unlock(foo->lock); <- fast path | 
|---|
| 1430 | *			if (free) | 
|---|
| 1431 | *				kfree(foo); | 
|---|
| 1432 | * raw_spin_unlock(foo->lock->wait_lock); | 
|---|
| 1433 | * | 
|---|
| 1434 | * So for the fastpath enabled kernel: | 
|---|
| 1435 | * | 
|---|
| 1436 | * Nothing can set the waiters bit as long as we hold | 
|---|
| 1437 | * lock->wait_lock. So we do the following sequence: | 
|---|
| 1438 | * | 
|---|
| 1439 | *	owner = rt_mutex_owner(lock); | 
|---|
| 1440 | *	clear_rt_mutex_waiters(lock); | 
|---|
| 1441 | *	raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock); | 
|---|
| 1442 | *	if (cmpxchg(&lock->owner, owner, 0) == owner) | 
|---|
| 1443 | *		return; | 
|---|
| 1444 | *	goto retry; | 
|---|
| 1445 | * | 
|---|
| 1446 | * The fastpath disabled variant is simple as all access to | 
|---|
| 1447 | * lock->owner is serialized by lock->wait_lock: | 
|---|
| 1448 | * | 
|---|
| 1449 | *	lock->owner = NULL; | 
|---|
| 1450 | *	raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock); | 
|---|
| 1451 | */ | 
|---|
| 1452 | while (!rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock)) { | 
|---|
| 1453 | /* Drops lock->wait_lock ! */ | 
|---|
| 1454 | if (unlock_rt_mutex_safe(lock, flags) == true) | 
|---|
| 1455 | return; | 
|---|
| 1456 | /* Relock the rtmutex and try again */ | 
|---|
| 1457 | raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&lock->wait_lock, flags); | 
|---|
| 1458 | } | 
|---|
| 1459 |  | 
|---|
| 1460 | /* | 
|---|
| 1461 | * The wakeup next waiter path does not suffer from the above | 
|---|
| 1462 | * race. See the comments there. | 
|---|
| 1463 | * | 
|---|
| 1464 | * Queue the next waiter for wakeup once we release the wait_lock. | 
|---|
| 1465 | */ | 
|---|
| 1466 | mark_wakeup_next_waiter(wqh: &wqh, lock); | 
|---|
| 1467 | raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lock->wait_lock, flags); | 
|---|
| 1468 |  | 
|---|
| 1469 | rt_mutex_wake_up_q(wqh: &wqh); | 
|---|
| 1470 | } | 
|---|
| 1471 |  | 
|---|
| 1472 | static __always_inline void __rt_mutex_unlock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock) | 
|---|
| 1473 | { | 
|---|
| 1474 | if (likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg_release(lock, current, NULL))) | 
|---|
| 1475 | return; | 
|---|
| 1476 |  | 
|---|
| 1477 | rt_mutex_slowunlock(lock); | 
|---|
| 1478 | } | 
|---|
| 1479 |  | 
|---|
| 1480 | #ifdef CONFIG_SMP | 
|---|
| 1481 | static bool rtmutex_spin_on_owner(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, | 
|---|
| 1482 | struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, | 
|---|
| 1483 | struct task_struct *owner) | 
|---|
| 1484 | { | 
|---|
| 1485 | bool res = true; | 
|---|
| 1486 |  | 
|---|
| 1487 | rcu_read_lock(); | 
|---|
| 1488 | for (;;) { | 
|---|
| 1489 | /* If owner changed, trylock again. */ | 
|---|
| 1490 | if (owner != rt_mutex_owner(lock)) | 
|---|
| 1491 | break; | 
|---|
| 1492 | /* | 
|---|
| 1493 | * Ensure that @owner is dereferenced after checking that | 
|---|
| 1494 | * the lock owner still matches @owner. If that fails, | 
|---|
| 1495 | * @owner might point to freed memory. If it still matches, | 
|---|
| 1496 | * the rcu_read_lock() ensures the memory stays valid. | 
|---|
| 1497 | */ | 
|---|
| 1498 | barrier(); | 
|---|
| 1499 | /* | 
|---|
| 1500 | * Stop spinning when: | 
|---|
| 1501 | *  - the lock owner has been scheduled out | 
|---|
| 1502 | *  - current is not longer the top waiter | 
|---|
| 1503 | *  - current is requested to reschedule (redundant | 
|---|
| 1504 | *    for CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU=y) | 
|---|
| 1505 | *  - the VCPU on which owner runs is preempted | 
|---|
| 1506 | */ | 
|---|
| 1507 | if (!owner_on_cpu(owner) || need_resched() || | 
|---|
| 1508 | !rt_mutex_waiter_is_top_waiter(lock, waiter)) { | 
|---|
| 1509 | res = false; | 
|---|
| 1510 | break; | 
|---|
| 1511 | } | 
|---|
| 1512 | cpu_relax(); | 
|---|
| 1513 | } | 
|---|
| 1514 | rcu_read_unlock(); | 
|---|
| 1515 | return res; | 
|---|
| 1516 | } | 
|---|
| 1517 | #else | 
|---|
| 1518 | static bool rtmutex_spin_on_owner(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, | 
|---|
| 1519 | struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, | 
|---|
| 1520 | struct task_struct *owner) | 
|---|
| 1521 | { | 
|---|
| 1522 | return false; | 
|---|
| 1523 | } | 
|---|
| 1524 | #endif | 
|---|
| 1525 |  | 
|---|
| 1526 | #ifdef RT_MUTEX_BUILD_MUTEX | 
|---|
| 1527 | /* | 
|---|
| 1528 | * Functions required for: | 
|---|
| 1529 | *	- rtmutex, futex on all kernels | 
|---|
| 1530 | *	- mutex and rwsem substitutions on RT kernels | 
|---|
| 1531 | */ | 
|---|
| 1532 |  | 
|---|
| 1533 | /* | 
|---|
| 1534 | * Remove a waiter from a lock and give up | 
|---|
| 1535 | * | 
|---|
| 1536 | * Must be called with lock->wait_lock held and interrupts disabled. It must | 
|---|
| 1537 | * have just failed to try_to_take_rt_mutex(). | 
|---|
| 1538 | */ | 
|---|
| 1539 | static void __sched remove_waiter(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, | 
|---|
| 1540 | struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter) | 
|---|
| 1541 | { | 
|---|
| 1542 | bool is_top_waiter = (waiter == rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)); | 
|---|
| 1543 | struct task_struct *owner = rt_mutex_owner(lock); | 
|---|
| 1544 | struct rt_mutex_base *next_lock; | 
|---|
| 1545 |  | 
|---|
| 1546 | lockdep_assert_held(&lock->wait_lock); | 
|---|
| 1547 |  | 
|---|
| 1548 | raw_spin_lock(¤t->pi_lock); | 
|---|
| 1549 | rt_mutex_dequeue(lock, waiter); | 
|---|
| 1550 | current->pi_blocked_on = NULL; | 
|---|
| 1551 | raw_spin_unlock(¤t->pi_lock); | 
|---|
| 1552 |  | 
|---|
| 1553 | /* | 
|---|
| 1554 | * Only update priority if the waiter was the highest priority | 
|---|
| 1555 | * waiter of the lock and there is an owner to update. | 
|---|
| 1556 | */ | 
|---|
| 1557 | if (!owner || !is_top_waiter) | 
|---|
| 1558 | return; | 
|---|
| 1559 |  | 
|---|
| 1560 | raw_spin_lock(&owner->pi_lock); | 
|---|
| 1561 |  | 
|---|
| 1562 | rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(task: owner, waiter); | 
|---|
| 1563 |  | 
|---|
| 1564 | if (rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock)) | 
|---|
| 1565 | rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(task: owner, waiter: rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)); | 
|---|
| 1566 |  | 
|---|
| 1567 | rt_mutex_adjust_prio(lock, p: owner); | 
|---|
| 1568 |  | 
|---|
| 1569 | /* Store the lock on which owner is blocked or NULL */ | 
|---|
| 1570 | next_lock = task_blocked_on_lock(p: owner); | 
|---|
| 1571 |  | 
|---|
| 1572 | raw_spin_unlock(&owner->pi_lock); | 
|---|
| 1573 |  | 
|---|
| 1574 | /* | 
|---|
| 1575 | * Don't walk the chain, if the owner task is not blocked | 
|---|
| 1576 | * itself. | 
|---|
| 1577 | */ | 
|---|
| 1578 | if (!next_lock) | 
|---|
| 1579 | return; | 
|---|
| 1580 |  | 
|---|
| 1581 | /* gets dropped in rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain()! */ | 
|---|
| 1582 | get_task_struct(t: owner); | 
|---|
| 1583 |  | 
|---|
| 1584 | raw_spin_unlock_irq(&lock->wait_lock); | 
|---|
| 1585 |  | 
|---|
| 1586 | rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(task: owner, chwalk: RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK, orig_lock: lock, | 
|---|
| 1587 | next_lock, NULL, current); | 
|---|
| 1588 |  | 
|---|
| 1589 | raw_spin_lock_irq(&lock->wait_lock); | 
|---|
| 1590 | } | 
|---|
| 1591 |  | 
|---|
| 1592 | /** | 
|---|
| 1593 | * rt_mutex_slowlock_block() - Perform the wait-wake-try-to-take loop | 
|---|
| 1594 | * @lock:		 the rt_mutex to take | 
|---|
| 1595 | * @ww_ctx:		 WW mutex context pointer | 
|---|
| 1596 | * @state:		 the state the task should block in (TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE | 
|---|
| 1597 | *			 or TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE) | 
|---|
| 1598 | * @timeout:		 the pre-initialized and started timer, or NULL for none | 
|---|
| 1599 | * @waiter:		 the pre-initialized rt_mutex_waiter | 
|---|
| 1600 | * @wake_q:		 wake_q of tasks to wake when we drop the lock->wait_lock | 
|---|
| 1601 | * | 
|---|
| 1602 | * Must be called with lock->wait_lock held and interrupts disabled | 
|---|
| 1603 | */ | 
|---|
| 1604 | static int __sched rt_mutex_slowlock_block(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, | 
|---|
| 1605 | struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx, | 
|---|
| 1606 | unsigned int state, | 
|---|
| 1607 | struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout, | 
|---|
| 1608 | struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, | 
|---|
| 1609 | struct wake_q_head *wake_q) | 
|---|
| 1610 | __releases(&lock->wait_lock) __acquires(&lock->wait_lock) | 
|---|
| 1611 | { | 
|---|
| 1612 | struct rt_mutex *rtm = container_of(lock, struct rt_mutex, rtmutex); | 
|---|
| 1613 | struct task_struct *owner; | 
|---|
| 1614 | int ret = 0; | 
|---|
| 1615 |  | 
|---|
| 1616 | lockevent_inc(rtmutex_slow_block); | 
|---|
| 1617 | for (;;) { | 
|---|
| 1618 | /* Try to acquire the lock: */ | 
|---|
| 1619 | if (try_to_take_rt_mutex(lock, current, waiter)) { | 
|---|
| 1620 | lockevent_inc(rtmutex_slow_acq3); | 
|---|
| 1621 | break; | 
|---|
| 1622 | } | 
|---|
| 1623 |  | 
|---|
| 1624 | if (timeout && !timeout->task) { | 
|---|
| 1625 | ret = -ETIMEDOUT; | 
|---|
| 1626 | break; | 
|---|
| 1627 | } | 
|---|
| 1628 | if (signal_pending_state(state, current)) { | 
|---|
| 1629 | ret = -EINTR; | 
|---|
| 1630 | break; | 
|---|
| 1631 | } | 
|---|
| 1632 |  | 
|---|
| 1633 | if (build_ww_mutex() && ww_ctx) { | 
|---|
| 1634 | ret = __ww_mutex_check_kill(lock: rtm, waiter, ww_ctx); | 
|---|
| 1635 | if (ret) | 
|---|
| 1636 | break; | 
|---|
| 1637 | } | 
|---|
| 1638 |  | 
|---|
| 1639 | if (waiter == rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)) | 
|---|
| 1640 | owner = rt_mutex_owner(lock); | 
|---|
| 1641 | else | 
|---|
| 1642 | owner = NULL; | 
|---|
| 1643 | raw_spin_unlock_irq_wake(lock: &lock->wait_lock, wake_q); | 
|---|
| 1644 |  | 
|---|
| 1645 | if (!owner || !rtmutex_spin_on_owner(lock, waiter, owner)) { | 
|---|
| 1646 | lockevent_inc(rtmutex_slow_sleep); | 
|---|
| 1647 | rt_mutex_schedule(); | 
|---|
| 1648 | } | 
|---|
| 1649 |  | 
|---|
| 1650 | raw_spin_lock_irq(&lock->wait_lock); | 
|---|
| 1651 | set_current_state(state); | 
|---|
| 1652 | } | 
|---|
| 1653 |  | 
|---|
| 1654 | __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); | 
|---|
| 1655 | return ret; | 
|---|
| 1656 | } | 
|---|
| 1657 |  | 
|---|
| 1658 | static void __sched rt_mutex_handle_deadlock(int res, int detect_deadlock, | 
|---|
| 1659 | struct rt_mutex_base *lock, | 
|---|
| 1660 | struct rt_mutex_waiter *w) | 
|---|
| 1661 | { | 
|---|
| 1662 | /* | 
|---|
| 1663 | * If the result is not -EDEADLOCK or the caller requested | 
|---|
| 1664 | * deadlock detection, nothing to do here. | 
|---|
| 1665 | */ | 
|---|
| 1666 | if (res != -EDEADLOCK || detect_deadlock) | 
|---|
| 1667 | return; | 
|---|
| 1668 |  | 
|---|
| 1669 | if (build_ww_mutex() && w->ww_ctx) | 
|---|
| 1670 | return; | 
|---|
| 1671 |  | 
|---|
| 1672 | raw_spin_unlock_irq(&lock->wait_lock); | 
|---|
| 1673 |  | 
|---|
| 1674 | WARN(1, "rtmutex deadlock detected\n"); | 
|---|
| 1675 |  | 
|---|
| 1676 | while (1) { | 
|---|
| 1677 | set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); | 
|---|
| 1678 | rt_mutex_schedule(); | 
|---|
| 1679 | } | 
|---|
| 1680 | } | 
|---|
| 1681 |  | 
|---|
| 1682 | /** | 
|---|
| 1683 | * __rt_mutex_slowlock - Locking slowpath invoked with lock::wait_lock held | 
|---|
| 1684 | * @lock:	The rtmutex to block lock | 
|---|
| 1685 | * @ww_ctx:	WW mutex context pointer | 
|---|
| 1686 | * @state:	The task state for sleeping | 
|---|
| 1687 | * @chwalk:	Indicator whether full or partial chainwalk is requested | 
|---|
| 1688 | * @waiter:	Initializer waiter for blocking | 
|---|
| 1689 | * @wake_q:	The wake_q to wake tasks after we release the wait_lock | 
|---|
| 1690 | */ | 
|---|
| 1691 | static int __sched __rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, | 
|---|
| 1692 | struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx, | 
|---|
| 1693 | unsigned int state, | 
|---|
| 1694 | enum rtmutex_chainwalk chwalk, | 
|---|
| 1695 | struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, | 
|---|
| 1696 | struct wake_q_head *wake_q) | 
|---|
| 1697 | { | 
|---|
| 1698 | struct rt_mutex *rtm = container_of(lock, struct rt_mutex, rtmutex); | 
|---|
| 1699 | struct ww_mutex *ww = ww_container_of(rtm); | 
|---|
| 1700 | int ret; | 
|---|
| 1701 |  | 
|---|
| 1702 | lockdep_assert_held(&lock->wait_lock); | 
|---|
| 1703 | lockevent_inc(rtmutex_slowlock); | 
|---|
| 1704 |  | 
|---|
| 1705 | /* Try to acquire the lock again: */ | 
|---|
| 1706 | if (try_to_take_rt_mutex(lock, current, NULL)) { | 
|---|
| 1707 | if (build_ww_mutex() && ww_ctx) { | 
|---|
| 1708 | __ww_mutex_check_waiters(lock: rtm, ww_ctx, wake_q); | 
|---|
| 1709 | ww_mutex_lock_acquired(lock: ww, ww_ctx); | 
|---|
| 1710 | } | 
|---|
| 1711 | lockevent_inc(rtmutex_slow_acq1); | 
|---|
| 1712 | return 0; | 
|---|
| 1713 | } | 
|---|
| 1714 |  | 
|---|
| 1715 | set_current_state(state); | 
|---|
| 1716 |  | 
|---|
| 1717 | trace_contention_begin(lock, LCB_F_RT); | 
|---|
| 1718 |  | 
|---|
| 1719 | ret = task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(lock, waiter, current, ww_ctx, chwalk, wake_q); | 
|---|
| 1720 | if (likely(!ret)) | 
|---|
| 1721 | ret = rt_mutex_slowlock_block(lock, ww_ctx, state, NULL, waiter, wake_q); | 
|---|
| 1722 |  | 
|---|
| 1723 | if (likely(!ret)) { | 
|---|
| 1724 | /* acquired the lock */ | 
|---|
| 1725 | if (build_ww_mutex() && ww_ctx) { | 
|---|
| 1726 | if (!ww_ctx->is_wait_die) | 
|---|
| 1727 | __ww_mutex_check_waiters(lock: rtm, ww_ctx, wake_q); | 
|---|
| 1728 | ww_mutex_lock_acquired(lock: ww, ww_ctx); | 
|---|
| 1729 | } | 
|---|
| 1730 | lockevent_inc(rtmutex_slow_acq2); | 
|---|
| 1731 | } else { | 
|---|
| 1732 | __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); | 
|---|
| 1733 | remove_waiter(lock, waiter); | 
|---|
| 1734 | rt_mutex_handle_deadlock(res: ret, detect_deadlock: chwalk, lock, w: waiter); | 
|---|
| 1735 | lockevent_inc(rtmutex_deadlock); | 
|---|
| 1736 | } | 
|---|
| 1737 |  | 
|---|
| 1738 | /* | 
|---|
| 1739 | * try_to_take_rt_mutex() sets the waiter bit | 
|---|
| 1740 | * unconditionally. We might have to fix that up. | 
|---|
| 1741 | */ | 
|---|
| 1742 | fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(lock, acquire_lock: true); | 
|---|
| 1743 |  | 
|---|
| 1744 | trace_contention_end(lock, ret); | 
|---|
| 1745 |  | 
|---|
| 1746 | return ret; | 
|---|
| 1747 | } | 
|---|
| 1748 |  | 
|---|
| 1749 | static inline int __rt_mutex_slowlock_locked(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, | 
|---|
| 1750 | struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx, | 
|---|
| 1751 | unsigned int state, | 
|---|
| 1752 | struct wake_q_head *wake_q) | 
|---|
| 1753 | { | 
|---|
| 1754 | struct rt_mutex_waiter waiter; | 
|---|
| 1755 | int ret; | 
|---|
| 1756 |  | 
|---|
| 1757 | rt_mutex_init_waiter(waiter: &waiter); | 
|---|
| 1758 | waiter.ww_ctx = ww_ctx; | 
|---|
| 1759 |  | 
|---|
| 1760 | ret = __rt_mutex_slowlock(lock, ww_ctx, state, chwalk: RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK, | 
|---|
| 1761 | waiter: &waiter, wake_q); | 
|---|
| 1762 |  | 
|---|
| 1763 | debug_rt_mutex_free_waiter(waiter: &waiter); | 
|---|
| 1764 | lockevent_cond_inc(rtmutex_slow_wake, !wake_q_empty(wake_q)); | 
|---|
| 1765 | return ret; | 
|---|
| 1766 | } | 
|---|
| 1767 |  | 
|---|
| 1768 | /* | 
|---|
| 1769 | * rt_mutex_slowlock - Locking slowpath invoked when fast path fails | 
|---|
| 1770 | * @lock:	The rtmutex to block lock | 
|---|
| 1771 | * @ww_ctx:	WW mutex context pointer | 
|---|
| 1772 | * @state:	The task state for sleeping | 
|---|
| 1773 | */ | 
|---|
| 1774 | static int __sched rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, | 
|---|
| 1775 | struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx, | 
|---|
| 1776 | unsigned int state) | 
|---|
| 1777 | { | 
|---|
| 1778 | DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q); | 
|---|
| 1779 | unsigned long flags; | 
|---|
| 1780 | int ret; | 
|---|
| 1781 |  | 
|---|
| 1782 | /* | 
|---|
| 1783 | * Do all pre-schedule work here, before we queue a waiter and invoke | 
|---|
| 1784 | * PI -- any such work that trips on rtlock (PREEMPT_RT spinlock) would | 
|---|
| 1785 | * otherwise recurse back into task_blocks_on_rt_mutex() through | 
|---|
| 1786 | * rtlock_slowlock() and will then enqueue a second waiter for this | 
|---|
| 1787 | * same task and things get really confusing real fast. | 
|---|
| 1788 | */ | 
|---|
| 1789 | rt_mutex_pre_schedule(); | 
|---|
| 1790 |  | 
|---|
| 1791 | /* | 
|---|
| 1792 | * Technically we could use raw_spin_[un]lock_irq() here, but this can | 
|---|
| 1793 | * be called in early boot if the cmpxchg() fast path is disabled | 
|---|
| 1794 | * (debug, no architecture support). In this case we will acquire the | 
|---|
| 1795 | * rtmutex with lock->wait_lock held. But we cannot unconditionally | 
|---|
| 1796 | * enable interrupts in that early boot case. So we need to use the | 
|---|
| 1797 | * irqsave/restore variants. | 
|---|
| 1798 | */ | 
|---|
| 1799 | raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&lock->wait_lock, flags); | 
|---|
| 1800 | ret = __rt_mutex_slowlock_locked(lock, ww_ctx, state, wake_q: &wake_q); | 
|---|
| 1801 | raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_wake(lock: &lock->wait_lock, flags, wake_q: &wake_q); | 
|---|
| 1802 | rt_mutex_post_schedule(); | 
|---|
| 1803 |  | 
|---|
| 1804 | return ret; | 
|---|
| 1805 | } | 
|---|
| 1806 |  | 
|---|
| 1807 | static __always_inline int __rt_mutex_lock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, | 
|---|
| 1808 | unsigned int state) | 
|---|
| 1809 | { | 
|---|
| 1810 | lockdep_assert(!current->pi_blocked_on); | 
|---|
| 1811 |  | 
|---|
| 1812 | if (likely(rt_mutex_try_acquire(lock))) | 
|---|
| 1813 | return 0; | 
|---|
| 1814 |  | 
|---|
| 1815 | return rt_mutex_slowlock(lock, NULL, state); | 
|---|
| 1816 | } | 
|---|
| 1817 | #endif /* RT_MUTEX_BUILD_MUTEX */ | 
|---|
| 1818 |  | 
|---|
| 1819 | #ifdef RT_MUTEX_BUILD_SPINLOCKS | 
|---|
| 1820 | /* | 
|---|
| 1821 | * Functions required for spin/rw_lock substitution on RT kernels | 
|---|
| 1822 | */ | 
|---|
| 1823 |  | 
|---|
| 1824 | /** | 
|---|
| 1825 | * rtlock_slowlock_locked - Slow path lock acquisition for RT locks | 
|---|
| 1826 | * @lock:	The underlying RT mutex | 
|---|
| 1827 | * @wake_q:	The wake_q to wake tasks after we release the wait_lock | 
|---|
| 1828 | */ | 
|---|
| 1829 | static void __sched rtlock_slowlock_locked(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, | 
|---|
| 1830 | struct wake_q_head *wake_q) | 
|---|
| 1831 | __releases(&lock->wait_lock) __acquires(&lock->wait_lock) | 
|---|
| 1832 | { | 
|---|
| 1833 | struct rt_mutex_waiter waiter; | 
|---|
| 1834 | struct task_struct *owner; | 
|---|
| 1835 |  | 
|---|
| 1836 | lockdep_assert_held(&lock->wait_lock); | 
|---|
| 1837 | lockevent_inc(rtlock_slowlock); | 
|---|
| 1838 |  | 
|---|
| 1839 | if (try_to_take_rt_mutex(lock, current, NULL)) { | 
|---|
| 1840 | lockevent_inc(rtlock_slow_acq1); | 
|---|
| 1841 | return; | 
|---|
| 1842 | } | 
|---|
| 1843 |  | 
|---|
| 1844 | rt_mutex_init_rtlock_waiter(&waiter); | 
|---|
| 1845 |  | 
|---|
| 1846 | /* Save current state and set state to TASK_RTLOCK_WAIT */ | 
|---|
| 1847 | current_save_and_set_rtlock_wait_state(); | 
|---|
| 1848 |  | 
|---|
| 1849 | trace_contention_begin(lock, LCB_F_RT); | 
|---|
| 1850 |  | 
|---|
| 1851 | task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(lock, &waiter, current, NULL, RT_MUTEX_MIN_CHAINWALK, wake_q); | 
|---|
| 1852 |  | 
|---|
| 1853 | for (;;) { | 
|---|
| 1854 | /* Try to acquire the lock again */ | 
|---|
| 1855 | if (try_to_take_rt_mutex(lock, current, &waiter)) { | 
|---|
| 1856 | lockevent_inc(rtlock_slow_acq2); | 
|---|
| 1857 | break; | 
|---|
| 1858 | } | 
|---|
| 1859 |  | 
|---|
| 1860 | if (&waiter == rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)) | 
|---|
| 1861 | owner = rt_mutex_owner(lock); | 
|---|
| 1862 | else | 
|---|
| 1863 | owner = NULL; | 
|---|
| 1864 | raw_spin_unlock_irq_wake(&lock->wait_lock, wake_q); | 
|---|
| 1865 |  | 
|---|
| 1866 | if (!owner || !rtmutex_spin_on_owner(lock, &waiter, owner)) { | 
|---|
| 1867 | lockevent_inc(rtlock_slow_sleep); | 
|---|
| 1868 | schedule_rtlock(); | 
|---|
| 1869 | } | 
|---|
| 1870 |  | 
|---|
| 1871 | raw_spin_lock_irq(&lock->wait_lock); | 
|---|
| 1872 | set_current_state(TASK_RTLOCK_WAIT); | 
|---|
| 1873 | } | 
|---|
| 1874 |  | 
|---|
| 1875 | /* Restore the task state */ | 
|---|
| 1876 | current_restore_rtlock_saved_state(); | 
|---|
| 1877 |  | 
|---|
| 1878 | /* | 
|---|
| 1879 | * try_to_take_rt_mutex() sets the waiter bit unconditionally. | 
|---|
| 1880 | * We might have to fix that up: | 
|---|
| 1881 | */ | 
|---|
| 1882 | fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(lock, true); | 
|---|
| 1883 | debug_rt_mutex_free_waiter(&waiter); | 
|---|
| 1884 |  | 
|---|
| 1885 | trace_contention_end(lock, 0); | 
|---|
| 1886 | lockevent_cond_inc(rtlock_slow_wake, !wake_q_empty(wake_q)); | 
|---|
| 1887 | } | 
|---|
| 1888 |  | 
|---|
| 1889 | static __always_inline void __sched rtlock_slowlock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock) | 
|---|
| 1890 | { | 
|---|
| 1891 | unsigned long flags; | 
|---|
| 1892 | DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q); | 
|---|
| 1893 |  | 
|---|
| 1894 | raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&lock->wait_lock, flags); | 
|---|
| 1895 | rtlock_slowlock_locked(lock, &wake_q); | 
|---|
| 1896 | raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_wake(&lock->wait_lock, flags, &wake_q); | 
|---|
| 1897 | } | 
|---|
| 1898 |  | 
|---|
| 1899 | #endif /* RT_MUTEX_BUILD_SPINLOCKS */ | 
|---|
| 1900 |  | 
|---|