| 1 | /* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ | 
|---|
| 2 |  | 
|---|
| 3 | /* | 
|---|
| 4 | * Using the avg_vruntime, do the right thing and preserve lag across | 
|---|
| 5 | * sleep+wake cycles. EEVDF placement strategy #1, #2 if disabled. | 
|---|
| 6 | */ | 
|---|
| 7 | SCHED_FEAT(PLACE_LAG, true) | 
|---|
| 8 | /* | 
|---|
| 9 | * Give new tasks half a slice to ease into the competition. | 
|---|
| 10 | */ | 
|---|
| 11 | SCHED_FEAT(PLACE_DEADLINE_INITIAL, true) | 
|---|
| 12 | /* | 
|---|
| 13 | * Preserve relative virtual deadline on 'migration'. | 
|---|
| 14 | */ | 
|---|
| 15 | SCHED_FEAT(PLACE_REL_DEADLINE, true) | 
|---|
| 16 | /* | 
|---|
| 17 | * Inhibit (wakeup) preemption until the current task has either matched the | 
|---|
| 18 | * 0-lag point or until is has exhausted it's slice. | 
|---|
| 19 | */ | 
|---|
| 20 | SCHED_FEAT(RUN_TO_PARITY, true) | 
|---|
| 21 | /* | 
|---|
| 22 | * Allow wakeup of tasks with a shorter slice to cancel RUN_TO_PARITY for | 
|---|
| 23 | * current. | 
|---|
| 24 | */ | 
|---|
| 25 | SCHED_FEAT(PREEMPT_SHORT, true) | 
|---|
| 26 |  | 
|---|
| 27 | /* | 
|---|
| 28 | * Prefer to schedule the task we woke last (assuming it failed | 
|---|
| 29 | * wakeup-preemption), since its likely going to consume data we | 
|---|
| 30 | * touched, increases cache locality. | 
|---|
| 31 | */ | 
|---|
| 32 | SCHED_FEAT(NEXT_BUDDY, false) | 
|---|
| 33 |  | 
|---|
| 34 | /* | 
|---|
| 35 | * Allow completely ignoring cfs_rq->next; which can be set from various | 
|---|
| 36 | * places: | 
|---|
| 37 | *   - NEXT_BUDDY (wakeup preemption) | 
|---|
| 38 | *   - yield_to_task() | 
|---|
| 39 | *   - cgroup dequeue / pick | 
|---|
| 40 | */ | 
|---|
| 41 | SCHED_FEAT(PICK_BUDDY, true) | 
|---|
| 42 |  | 
|---|
| 43 | /* | 
|---|
| 44 | * Consider buddies to be cache hot, decreases the likeliness of a | 
|---|
| 45 | * cache buddy being migrated away, increases cache locality. | 
|---|
| 46 | */ | 
|---|
| 47 | SCHED_FEAT(CACHE_HOT_BUDDY, true) | 
|---|
| 48 |  | 
|---|
| 49 | /* | 
|---|
| 50 | * Delay dequeueing tasks until they get selected or woken. | 
|---|
| 51 | * | 
|---|
| 52 | * By delaying the dequeue for non-eligible tasks, they remain in the | 
|---|
| 53 | * competition and can burn off their negative lag. When they get selected | 
|---|
| 54 | * they'll have positive lag by definition. | 
|---|
| 55 | * | 
|---|
| 56 | * DELAY_ZERO clips the lag on dequeue (or wakeup) to 0. | 
|---|
| 57 | */ | 
|---|
| 58 | SCHED_FEAT(DELAY_DEQUEUE, true) | 
|---|
| 59 | SCHED_FEAT(DELAY_ZERO, true) | 
|---|
| 60 |  | 
|---|
| 61 | /* | 
|---|
| 62 | * Allow wakeup-time preemption of the current task: | 
|---|
| 63 | */ | 
|---|
| 64 | SCHED_FEAT(WAKEUP_PREEMPTION, true) | 
|---|
| 65 |  | 
|---|
| 66 | SCHED_FEAT(HRTICK, false) | 
|---|
| 67 | SCHED_FEAT(HRTICK_DL, false) | 
|---|
| 68 |  | 
|---|
| 69 | /* | 
|---|
| 70 | * Decrement CPU capacity based on time not spent running tasks | 
|---|
| 71 | */ | 
|---|
| 72 | SCHED_FEAT(NONTASK_CAPACITY, true) | 
|---|
| 73 |  | 
|---|
| 74 | #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT | 
|---|
| 75 | SCHED_FEAT(TTWU_QUEUE, false) | 
|---|
| 76 | #else | 
|---|
| 77 |  | 
|---|
| 78 | /* | 
|---|
| 79 | * Queue remote wakeups on the target CPU and process them | 
|---|
| 80 | * using the scheduler IPI. Reduces rq->lock contention/bounces. | 
|---|
| 81 | */ | 
|---|
| 82 | SCHED_FEAT(TTWU_QUEUE, true) | 
|---|
| 83 | #endif | 
|---|
| 84 |  | 
|---|
| 85 | /* | 
|---|
| 86 | * When doing wakeups, attempt to limit superfluous scans of the LLC domain. | 
|---|
| 87 | */ | 
|---|
| 88 | SCHED_FEAT(SIS_UTIL, true) | 
|---|
| 89 |  | 
|---|
| 90 | /* | 
|---|
| 91 | * Issue a WARN when we do multiple update_rq_clock() calls | 
|---|
| 92 | * in a single rq->lock section. Default disabled because the | 
|---|
| 93 | * annotations are not complete. | 
|---|
| 94 | */ | 
|---|
| 95 | SCHED_FEAT(WARN_DOUBLE_CLOCK, false) | 
|---|
| 96 |  | 
|---|
| 97 | #ifdef HAVE_RT_PUSH_IPI | 
|---|
| 98 | /* | 
|---|
| 99 | * In order to avoid a thundering herd attack of CPUs that are | 
|---|
| 100 | * lowering their priorities at the same time, and there being | 
|---|
| 101 | * a single CPU that has an RT task that can migrate and is waiting | 
|---|
| 102 | * to run, where the other CPUs will try to take that CPUs | 
|---|
| 103 | * rq lock and possibly create a large contention, sending an | 
|---|
| 104 | * IPI to that CPU and let that CPU push the RT task to where | 
|---|
| 105 | * it should go may be a better scenario. | 
|---|
| 106 | */ | 
|---|
| 107 | SCHED_FEAT(RT_PUSH_IPI, true) | 
|---|
| 108 | #endif | 
|---|
| 109 |  | 
|---|
| 110 | SCHED_FEAT(RT_RUNTIME_SHARE, false) | 
|---|
| 111 | SCHED_FEAT(LB_MIN, false) | 
|---|
| 112 | SCHED_FEAT(ATTACH_AGE_LOAD, true) | 
|---|
| 113 |  | 
|---|
| 114 | SCHED_FEAT(WA_IDLE, true) | 
|---|
| 115 | SCHED_FEAT(WA_WEIGHT, true) | 
|---|
| 116 | SCHED_FEAT(WA_BIAS, true) | 
|---|
| 117 |  | 
|---|
| 118 | /* | 
|---|
| 119 | * UtilEstimation. Use estimated CPU utilization. | 
|---|
| 120 | */ | 
|---|
| 121 | SCHED_FEAT(UTIL_EST, true) | 
|---|
| 122 |  | 
|---|
| 123 | SCHED_FEAT(LATENCY_WARN, false) | 
|---|
| 124 |  | 
|---|