| 1 | // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 |
| 2 | /* |
| 3 | * Lockless hierarchical page accounting & limiting |
| 4 | * |
| 5 | * Copyright (C) 2014 Red Hat, Inc., Johannes Weiner |
| 6 | */ |
| 7 | |
| 8 | #include <linux/page_counter.h> |
| 9 | #include <linux/atomic.h> |
| 10 | #include <linux/kernel.h> |
| 11 | #include <linux/string.h> |
| 12 | #include <linux/sched.h> |
| 13 | #include <linux/bug.h> |
| 14 | #include <asm/page.h> |
| 15 | |
| 16 | static bool track_protection(struct page_counter *c) |
| 17 | { |
| 18 | return c->protection_support; |
| 19 | } |
| 20 | |
| 21 | static void propagate_protected_usage(struct page_counter *c, |
| 22 | unsigned long usage) |
| 23 | { |
| 24 | unsigned long protected, old_protected; |
| 25 | long delta; |
| 26 | |
| 27 | if (!c->parent) |
| 28 | return; |
| 29 | |
| 30 | protected = min(usage, READ_ONCE(c->min)); |
| 31 | old_protected = atomic_long_read(v: &c->min_usage); |
| 32 | if (protected != old_protected) { |
| 33 | old_protected = atomic_long_xchg(v: &c->min_usage, new: protected); |
| 34 | delta = protected - old_protected; |
| 35 | if (delta) |
| 36 | atomic_long_add(i: delta, v: &c->parent->children_min_usage); |
| 37 | } |
| 38 | |
| 39 | protected = min(usage, READ_ONCE(c->low)); |
| 40 | old_protected = atomic_long_read(v: &c->low_usage); |
| 41 | if (protected != old_protected) { |
| 42 | old_protected = atomic_long_xchg(v: &c->low_usage, new: protected); |
| 43 | delta = protected - old_protected; |
| 44 | if (delta) |
| 45 | atomic_long_add(i: delta, v: &c->parent->children_low_usage); |
| 46 | } |
| 47 | } |
| 48 | |
| 49 | /** |
| 50 | * page_counter_cancel - take pages out of the local counter |
| 51 | * @counter: counter |
| 52 | * @nr_pages: number of pages to cancel |
| 53 | */ |
| 54 | void page_counter_cancel(struct page_counter *counter, unsigned long nr_pages) |
| 55 | { |
| 56 | long new; |
| 57 | |
| 58 | new = atomic_long_sub_return(i: nr_pages, v: &counter->usage); |
| 59 | /* More uncharges than charges? */ |
| 60 | if (WARN_ONCE(new < 0, "page_counter underflow: %ld nr_pages=%lu\n" , |
| 61 | new, nr_pages)) { |
| 62 | new = 0; |
| 63 | atomic_long_set(v: &counter->usage, i: new); |
| 64 | } |
| 65 | if (track_protection(c: counter)) |
| 66 | propagate_protected_usage(c: counter, usage: new); |
| 67 | } |
| 68 | |
| 69 | /** |
| 70 | * page_counter_charge - hierarchically charge pages |
| 71 | * @counter: counter |
| 72 | * @nr_pages: number of pages to charge |
| 73 | * |
| 74 | * NOTE: This does not consider any configured counter limits. |
| 75 | */ |
| 76 | void page_counter_charge(struct page_counter *counter, unsigned long nr_pages) |
| 77 | { |
| 78 | struct page_counter *c; |
| 79 | bool protection = track_protection(c: counter); |
| 80 | |
| 81 | for (c = counter; c; c = c->parent) { |
| 82 | long new; |
| 83 | |
| 84 | new = atomic_long_add_return(i: nr_pages, v: &c->usage); |
| 85 | if (protection) |
| 86 | propagate_protected_usage(c, usage: new); |
| 87 | /* |
| 88 | * This is indeed racy, but we can live with some |
| 89 | * inaccuracy in the watermark. |
| 90 | * |
| 91 | * Notably, we have two watermarks to allow for both a globally |
| 92 | * visible peak and one that can be reset at a smaller scope. |
| 93 | * |
| 94 | * Since we reset both watermarks when the global reset occurs, |
| 95 | * we can guarantee that watermark >= local_watermark, so we |
| 96 | * don't need to do both comparisons every time. |
| 97 | * |
| 98 | * On systems with branch predictors, the inner condition should |
| 99 | * be almost free. |
| 100 | */ |
| 101 | if (new > READ_ONCE(c->local_watermark)) { |
| 102 | WRITE_ONCE(c->local_watermark, new); |
| 103 | if (new > READ_ONCE(c->watermark)) |
| 104 | WRITE_ONCE(c->watermark, new); |
| 105 | } |
| 106 | } |
| 107 | } |
| 108 | |
| 109 | /** |
| 110 | * page_counter_try_charge - try to hierarchically charge pages |
| 111 | * @counter: counter |
| 112 | * @nr_pages: number of pages to charge |
| 113 | * @fail: points first counter to hit its limit, if any |
| 114 | * |
| 115 | * Returns %true on success, or %false and @fail if the counter or one |
| 116 | * of its ancestors has hit its configured limit. |
| 117 | */ |
| 118 | bool page_counter_try_charge(struct page_counter *counter, |
| 119 | unsigned long nr_pages, |
| 120 | struct page_counter **fail) |
| 121 | { |
| 122 | struct page_counter *c; |
| 123 | bool protection = track_protection(c: counter); |
| 124 | bool track_failcnt = counter->track_failcnt; |
| 125 | |
| 126 | for (c = counter; c; c = c->parent) { |
| 127 | long new; |
| 128 | /* |
| 129 | * Charge speculatively to avoid an expensive CAS. If |
| 130 | * a bigger charge fails, it might falsely lock out a |
| 131 | * racing smaller charge and send it into reclaim |
| 132 | * early, but the error is limited to the difference |
| 133 | * between the two sizes, which is less than 2M/4M in |
| 134 | * case of a THP locking out a regular page charge. |
| 135 | * |
| 136 | * The atomic_long_add_return() implies a full memory |
| 137 | * barrier between incrementing the count and reading |
| 138 | * the limit. When racing with page_counter_set_max(), |
| 139 | * we either see the new limit or the setter sees the |
| 140 | * counter has changed and retries. |
| 141 | */ |
| 142 | new = atomic_long_add_return(i: nr_pages, v: &c->usage); |
| 143 | if (new > c->max) { |
| 144 | atomic_long_sub(i: nr_pages, v: &c->usage); |
| 145 | /* |
| 146 | * This is racy, but we can live with some |
| 147 | * inaccuracy in the failcnt which is only used |
| 148 | * to report stats. |
| 149 | */ |
| 150 | if (track_failcnt) |
| 151 | data_race(c->failcnt++); |
| 152 | *fail = c; |
| 153 | goto failed; |
| 154 | } |
| 155 | if (protection) |
| 156 | propagate_protected_usage(c, usage: new); |
| 157 | |
| 158 | /* see comment on page_counter_charge */ |
| 159 | if (new > READ_ONCE(c->local_watermark)) { |
| 160 | WRITE_ONCE(c->local_watermark, new); |
| 161 | if (new > READ_ONCE(c->watermark)) |
| 162 | WRITE_ONCE(c->watermark, new); |
| 163 | } |
| 164 | } |
| 165 | return true; |
| 166 | |
| 167 | failed: |
| 168 | for (c = counter; c != *fail; c = c->parent) |
| 169 | page_counter_cancel(counter: c, nr_pages); |
| 170 | |
| 171 | return false; |
| 172 | } |
| 173 | |
| 174 | /** |
| 175 | * page_counter_uncharge - hierarchically uncharge pages |
| 176 | * @counter: counter |
| 177 | * @nr_pages: number of pages to uncharge |
| 178 | */ |
| 179 | void page_counter_uncharge(struct page_counter *counter, unsigned long nr_pages) |
| 180 | { |
| 181 | struct page_counter *c; |
| 182 | |
| 183 | for (c = counter; c; c = c->parent) |
| 184 | page_counter_cancel(counter: c, nr_pages); |
| 185 | } |
| 186 | |
| 187 | /** |
| 188 | * page_counter_set_max - set the maximum number of pages allowed |
| 189 | * @counter: counter |
| 190 | * @nr_pages: limit to set |
| 191 | * |
| 192 | * Returns 0 on success, -EBUSY if the current number of pages on the |
| 193 | * counter already exceeds the specified limit. |
| 194 | * |
| 195 | * The caller must serialize invocations on the same counter. |
| 196 | */ |
| 197 | int page_counter_set_max(struct page_counter *counter, unsigned long nr_pages) |
| 198 | { |
| 199 | for (;;) { |
| 200 | unsigned long old; |
| 201 | long usage; |
| 202 | |
| 203 | /* |
| 204 | * Update the limit while making sure that it's not |
| 205 | * below the concurrently-changing counter value. |
| 206 | * |
| 207 | * The xchg implies two full memory barriers before |
| 208 | * and after, so the read-swap-read is ordered and |
| 209 | * ensures coherency with page_counter_try_charge(): |
| 210 | * that function modifies the count before checking |
| 211 | * the limit, so if it sees the old limit, we see the |
| 212 | * modified counter and retry. |
| 213 | */ |
| 214 | usage = page_counter_read(counter); |
| 215 | |
| 216 | if (usage > nr_pages) |
| 217 | return -EBUSY; |
| 218 | |
| 219 | old = xchg(&counter->max, nr_pages); |
| 220 | |
| 221 | if (page_counter_read(counter) <= usage || nr_pages >= old) |
| 222 | return 0; |
| 223 | |
| 224 | counter->max = old; |
| 225 | cond_resched(); |
| 226 | } |
| 227 | } |
| 228 | |
| 229 | /** |
| 230 | * page_counter_set_min - set the amount of protected memory |
| 231 | * @counter: counter |
| 232 | * @nr_pages: value to set |
| 233 | * |
| 234 | * The caller must serialize invocations on the same counter. |
| 235 | */ |
| 236 | void page_counter_set_min(struct page_counter *counter, unsigned long nr_pages) |
| 237 | { |
| 238 | struct page_counter *c; |
| 239 | |
| 240 | WRITE_ONCE(counter->min, nr_pages); |
| 241 | |
| 242 | for (c = counter; c; c = c->parent) |
| 243 | propagate_protected_usage(c, usage: atomic_long_read(v: &c->usage)); |
| 244 | } |
| 245 | |
| 246 | /** |
| 247 | * page_counter_set_low - set the amount of protected memory |
| 248 | * @counter: counter |
| 249 | * @nr_pages: value to set |
| 250 | * |
| 251 | * The caller must serialize invocations on the same counter. |
| 252 | */ |
| 253 | void page_counter_set_low(struct page_counter *counter, unsigned long nr_pages) |
| 254 | { |
| 255 | struct page_counter *c; |
| 256 | |
| 257 | WRITE_ONCE(counter->low, nr_pages); |
| 258 | |
| 259 | for (c = counter; c; c = c->parent) |
| 260 | propagate_protected_usage(c, usage: atomic_long_read(v: &c->usage)); |
| 261 | } |
| 262 | |
| 263 | /** |
| 264 | * page_counter_memparse - memparse() for page counter limits |
| 265 | * @buf: string to parse |
| 266 | * @max: string meaning maximum possible value |
| 267 | * @nr_pages: returns the result in number of pages |
| 268 | * |
| 269 | * Returns -EINVAL, or 0 and @nr_pages on success. @nr_pages will be |
| 270 | * limited to %PAGE_COUNTER_MAX. |
| 271 | */ |
| 272 | int page_counter_memparse(const char *buf, const char *max, |
| 273 | unsigned long *nr_pages) |
| 274 | { |
| 275 | char *end; |
| 276 | u64 bytes; |
| 277 | |
| 278 | if (!strcmp(buf, max)) { |
| 279 | *nr_pages = PAGE_COUNTER_MAX; |
| 280 | return 0; |
| 281 | } |
| 282 | |
| 283 | bytes = memparse(ptr: buf, retptr: &end); |
| 284 | if (*end != '\0') |
| 285 | return -EINVAL; |
| 286 | |
| 287 | *nr_pages = min(bytes / PAGE_SIZE, (u64)PAGE_COUNTER_MAX); |
| 288 | |
| 289 | return 0; |
| 290 | } |
| 291 | |
| 292 | |
| 293 | #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MEMCG) || IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CGROUP_DMEM) |
| 294 | /* |
| 295 | * This function calculates an individual page counter's effective |
| 296 | * protection which is derived from its own memory.min/low, its |
| 297 | * parent's and siblings' settings, as well as the actual memory |
| 298 | * distribution in the tree. |
| 299 | * |
| 300 | * The following rules apply to the effective protection values: |
| 301 | * |
| 302 | * 1. At the first level of reclaim, effective protection is equal to |
| 303 | * the declared protection in memory.min and memory.low. |
| 304 | * |
| 305 | * 2. To enable safe delegation of the protection configuration, at |
| 306 | * subsequent levels the effective protection is capped to the |
| 307 | * parent's effective protection. |
| 308 | * |
| 309 | * 3. To make complex and dynamic subtrees easier to configure, the |
| 310 | * user is allowed to overcommit the declared protection at a given |
| 311 | * level. If that is the case, the parent's effective protection is |
| 312 | * distributed to the children in proportion to how much protection |
| 313 | * they have declared and how much of it they are utilizing. |
| 314 | * |
| 315 | * This makes distribution proportional, but also work-conserving: |
| 316 | * if one counter claims much more protection than it uses memory, |
| 317 | * the unused remainder is available to its siblings. |
| 318 | * |
| 319 | * 4. Conversely, when the declared protection is undercommitted at a |
| 320 | * given level, the distribution of the larger parental protection |
| 321 | * budget is NOT proportional. A counter's protection from a sibling |
| 322 | * is capped to its own memory.min/low setting. |
| 323 | * |
| 324 | * 5. However, to allow protecting recursive subtrees from each other |
| 325 | * without having to declare each individual counter's fixed share |
| 326 | * of the ancestor's claim to protection, any unutilized - |
| 327 | * "floating" - protection from up the tree is distributed in |
| 328 | * proportion to each counter's *usage*. This makes the protection |
| 329 | * neutral wrt sibling cgroups and lets them compete freely over |
| 330 | * the shared parental protection budget, but it protects the |
| 331 | * subtree as a whole from neighboring subtrees. |
| 332 | * |
| 333 | * Note that 4. and 5. are not in conflict: 4. is about protecting |
| 334 | * against immediate siblings whereas 5. is about protecting against |
| 335 | * neighboring subtrees. |
| 336 | */ |
| 337 | static unsigned long effective_protection(unsigned long usage, |
| 338 | unsigned long parent_usage, |
| 339 | unsigned long setting, |
| 340 | unsigned long parent_effective, |
| 341 | unsigned long siblings_protected, |
| 342 | bool recursive_protection) |
| 343 | { |
| 344 | unsigned long protected; |
| 345 | unsigned long ep; |
| 346 | |
| 347 | protected = min(usage, setting); |
| 348 | /* |
| 349 | * If all cgroups at this level combined claim and use more |
| 350 | * protection than what the parent affords them, distribute |
| 351 | * shares in proportion to utilization. |
| 352 | * |
| 353 | * We are using actual utilization rather than the statically |
| 354 | * claimed protection in order to be work-conserving: claimed |
| 355 | * but unused protection is available to siblings that would |
| 356 | * otherwise get a smaller chunk than what they claimed. |
| 357 | */ |
| 358 | if (siblings_protected > parent_effective) |
| 359 | return protected * parent_effective / siblings_protected; |
| 360 | |
| 361 | /* |
| 362 | * Ok, utilized protection of all children is within what the |
| 363 | * parent affords them, so we know whatever this child claims |
| 364 | * and utilizes is effectively protected. |
| 365 | * |
| 366 | * If there is unprotected usage beyond this value, reclaim |
| 367 | * will apply pressure in proportion to that amount. |
| 368 | * |
| 369 | * If there is unutilized protection, the cgroup will be fully |
| 370 | * shielded from reclaim, but we do return a smaller value for |
| 371 | * protection than what the group could enjoy in theory. This |
| 372 | * is okay. With the overcommit distribution above, effective |
| 373 | * protection is always dependent on how memory is actually |
| 374 | * consumed among the siblings anyway. |
| 375 | */ |
| 376 | ep = protected; |
| 377 | |
| 378 | /* |
| 379 | * If the children aren't claiming (all of) the protection |
| 380 | * afforded to them by the parent, distribute the remainder in |
| 381 | * proportion to the (unprotected) memory of each cgroup. That |
| 382 | * way, cgroups that aren't explicitly prioritized wrt each |
| 383 | * other compete freely over the allowance, but they are |
| 384 | * collectively protected from neighboring trees. |
| 385 | * |
| 386 | * We're using unprotected memory for the weight so that if |
| 387 | * some cgroups DO claim explicit protection, we don't protect |
| 388 | * the same bytes twice. |
| 389 | * |
| 390 | * Check both usage and parent_usage against the respective |
| 391 | * protected values. One should imply the other, but they |
| 392 | * aren't read atomically - make sure the division is sane. |
| 393 | */ |
| 394 | if (!recursive_protection) |
| 395 | return ep; |
| 396 | |
| 397 | if (parent_effective > siblings_protected && |
| 398 | parent_usage > siblings_protected && |
| 399 | usage > protected) { |
| 400 | unsigned long unclaimed; |
| 401 | |
| 402 | unclaimed = parent_effective - siblings_protected; |
| 403 | unclaimed *= usage - protected; |
| 404 | unclaimed /= parent_usage - siblings_protected; |
| 405 | |
| 406 | ep += unclaimed; |
| 407 | } |
| 408 | |
| 409 | return ep; |
| 410 | } |
| 411 | |
| 412 | |
| 413 | /** |
| 414 | * page_counter_calculate_protection - check if memory consumption is in the normal range |
| 415 | * @root: the top ancestor of the sub-tree being checked |
| 416 | * @counter: the page_counter the counter to update |
| 417 | * @recursive_protection: Whether to use memory_recursiveprot behavior. |
| 418 | * |
| 419 | * Calculates elow/emin thresholds for given page_counter. |
| 420 | * |
| 421 | * WARNING: This function is not stateless! It can only be used as part |
| 422 | * of a top-down tree iteration, not for isolated queries. |
| 423 | */ |
| 424 | void page_counter_calculate_protection(struct page_counter *root, |
| 425 | struct page_counter *counter, |
| 426 | bool recursive_protection) |
| 427 | { |
| 428 | unsigned long usage, parent_usage; |
| 429 | struct page_counter *parent = counter->parent; |
| 430 | |
| 431 | /* |
| 432 | * Effective values of the reclaim targets are ignored so they |
| 433 | * can be stale. Have a look at mem_cgroup_protection for more |
| 434 | * details. |
| 435 | * TODO: calculation should be more robust so that we do not need |
| 436 | * that special casing. |
| 437 | */ |
| 438 | if (root == counter) |
| 439 | return; |
| 440 | |
| 441 | usage = page_counter_read(counter); |
| 442 | if (!usage) |
| 443 | return; |
| 444 | |
| 445 | if (parent == root) { |
| 446 | counter->emin = READ_ONCE(counter->min); |
| 447 | counter->elow = READ_ONCE(counter->low); |
| 448 | return; |
| 449 | } |
| 450 | |
| 451 | parent_usage = page_counter_read(parent); |
| 452 | |
| 453 | WRITE_ONCE(counter->emin, effective_protection(usage, parent_usage, |
| 454 | READ_ONCE(counter->min), |
| 455 | READ_ONCE(parent->emin), |
| 456 | atomic_long_read(&parent->children_min_usage), |
| 457 | recursive_protection)); |
| 458 | |
| 459 | WRITE_ONCE(counter->elow, effective_protection(usage, parent_usage, |
| 460 | READ_ONCE(counter->low), |
| 461 | READ_ONCE(parent->elow), |
| 462 | atomic_long_read(&parent->children_low_usage), |
| 463 | recursive_protection)); |
| 464 | } |
| 465 | #endif /* CONFIG_MEMCG || CONFIG_CGROUP_DMEM */ |
| 466 | |